Jeremy Clayville
NJIT · 2025–26 · 15 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
291:23 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 15
- Minutes per game
- 19:26
- Points per game
- 6.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.5 / 1.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.6 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.6 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 1.8 |
| Season totals | 99 | 22 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 13 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 37–111 | 33.3% | 7.4 | 15.2 |
| 2P | 15–39 | 38.5%† | 2.6 | 5.4 |
| 3P | 22–72 | 30.6% | 4.8 | 9.9 |
| FT | 3–3 | 100.0%† | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43.2% | 44.1% | 64.9% | 2.7% | 0.95 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
NJIT · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $7K
- 80% range $1K to $24K
- Median share of team pool
- 4.4%
- team pool $215K, 80% range $79K to $595K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $6K to $7K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 25.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
NJIT: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | NJIT | $7Kspeculative | $1K to $24K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.9 | -1.7 to -0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -1.2 | +0.3 | +1.3range +1.2 to +1.5 | 987 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 19:51 | 19:26 | 10:42–28:51 | |
| Points | 6.0 | 6.6 | 0.0–16.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 37.5% | 39.2% | 0.0%–75.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-03 | Binghamton | W 73–65 | 16:42 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 70.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | Penn | L 61–80 | 14:19 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1-6 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 16.7% |
| 2025-12-22 · NCAA | Butler | L 52–101 | 10:42 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Sacred Heart | L 49–65 | 28:51 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-11 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 40.9% |
| 2025-12-10 | New Haven | W 70–64 | 28:41 | 12 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-10 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-05 | High Point | L 72–89 | 19:42 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-8 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-28 | Eastern Mich. | L 55–73 | 12:32 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | Louisville | L 47–104 | 15:59 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Cincinnati | L 67–94 | 17:12 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-11 | 1-7 | 1-1 | 31.8% |
| 2025-11-22 | Navy | L 70–86 | 25:10 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6-11 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 72.7% |
| 2025-11-18 | Drexel | L 43–75 | 19:18 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-6 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | FDU | W 93–81 | 22:36 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 35.7% |
| 2025-11-11 | Loyola Maryland | W 66–64 | 27:21 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5-11 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 63.6% |
| 2025-11-08 | Fairfield | L 53–74 | 14:18 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1-8 | 0-6 | 0-0 | 12.5% |
| 2025-11-04 | Fordham | W 72–61 | 18:00 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |