Curtis Williams Jr.
Tulane · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1026:53 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 32:05
- Points per game
- 12.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.8 / 1.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.4 | 4.8 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.5 | 6.0 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Season totals | 397 | 153 | 38 | 37 | 16 | 47 | 49 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 140–346 | 40.5% | 10.8 | 13.5 |
| 2P | 74–151 | 49.0% | 4.7 | 5.9 |
| 3P | 66–195 | 33.8% | 6.1 | 7.6 |
| FT | 51–61 | 83.6% | 1.9 | 2.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.0% | 53.2% | 56.4% | 17.6% | 0.81 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Tulane · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $80K
- 80% range $6K to $245K
- Median share of team pool
- 11.5%
- team pool $940K, 80% range $425K to $2.15M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $69K to $86K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $6K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 81.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Tulane: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Tulane | $80Kspeculative | $6K to $245K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.7 | -1.7 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | -1.4 | +4.8range +4.2 to +5.5 | 3,314 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Georgetown | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.5 | -1.7 to +0.8 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -0.6 | +1.4range +1.1 to +1.7 | 1,295 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 37:36 | 32:05 | 22:42–43:44 | |
| Points | 13.2 | 12.4 | 2.0–32.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 39.8% | 49.7% | 16.7%–122.2% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-12 | Charlotte | L 60–74 | 35:53 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-12 | 2-9 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-11 | Memphis | W 81–69 | 36:16 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-10 | 3-8 | 2-2 | 45.0% |
| 2026-03-08 | Memphis | L 95–96 | 39:02 | 11 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-13 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 42.3% |
| 2026-03-05 | Temple | L 60–89 | 39:06 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-14 | 1-8 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-03-01 | South Fla. | L 62–90 | 37:42 | 27 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-16 | 5-12 | 10-11 | 53.1% |
| 2026-02-25 | Tulsa | L 56–90 | 27:53 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7-12 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-22 | Rice | W 81–75 | 30:54 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3-10 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 35.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | North Texas | W 77–71 | 33:24 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4-14 | 2-8 | 1-1 | 35.7% |
| 2026-02-15 | UAB | W 55–54 | 26:21 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2-9 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-11 | Temple | W 77–66 | 31:23 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-08 | Wichita St. | L 61–75 | 25:44 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-01 | Memphis | W 78–76 | 31:03 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-28 | South Fla. | L 83–97 | 23:09 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-11 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-23 | Charlotte | L 70–73 | 34:54 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3-10 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 35.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Fla. Atlantic | L 74–79 | 38:24 | 27 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-14 | 3-7 | 8-8 | 67.9% |
| 2026-01-18 | North Texas | L 63–71 | 36:14 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5-9 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-14 | UAB | L 69–82 | 32:52 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3-9 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 44.4% |
| 2026-01-10 | UTSA | W 85–52 | 30:18 | 22 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8-15 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 73.3% |
| 2026-01-04 | Fla. Atlantic | W 69–66 | 32:58 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 38.9% |
| 2025-12-31 | East Carolina | W 79–70 | 26:08 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-8 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Portland St. | W 63–61 | 30:28 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-12 | 0-6 | 2-3 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Louisiana Tech | W 61–53 | 34:01 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-11 | 1-7 | 4-4 | 22.7% |
| 2025-12-14 | UC San Diego | L 67–93 | 28:11 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-15 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 36.7% |
| 2025-12-06 | Akron | L 71–88 | 37:07 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4-13 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 42.3% |
| 2025-12-02 | Grambling | W 65–63 | 38:38 | 17 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-11 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 72.7% |
| 2025-11-28 | Nicholls | W 82–72 | 29:00 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6-11 | 1-5 | 3-5 | 59.1% |
| 2025-11-23 | Boston College | W 93–90 | 43:44 | 32 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 12-18 | 4-8 | 4-4 | 77.8% |
| 2025-11-21 | Utah St. | L 75–96 | 25:49 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4-9 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 61.1% |
| 2025-11-14 | LSU New Orleans | L 63–85 | 26:11 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3-9 | 1-6 | 3-4 | 38.9% |
| 2025-11-11 | Louisiana | W 66–62 | 26:20 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-9 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Texas St. | W 79–71 | 22:42 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-03 | Samford | W 85–72 | 35:04 | 22 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9-9 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 122.2% |