Brody Robinson
Oakland · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1122:10 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 36:12
- Points per game
- 17.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.8 / 6.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 17.6 | 2.8 | 6.7 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 1.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.5 | 3.1 | 7.4 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 2.9 | 1.9 |
| Season totals | 547 | 86 | 209 | 41 | 1 | 80 | 54 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 137–337 | 40.7% | 10.9 | 12.0 |
| 2P | 62–134 | 46.3% | 4.3 | 4.8 |
| 3P | 75–203 | 36.9% | 6.5 | 7.2 |
| FT | 198–247 | 80.2% | 8.0 | 8.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.8% | 61.4% | 60.2% | 73.3% | 2.61 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Oakland · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $42K
- 80% range $13K to $125K
- Median share of team pool
- 19.5%
- team pool $215K, 80% range $78K to $575K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $40K to $51K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 90.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Oakland: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Oakland | $42Kspeculative | $13K to $125K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.2 | +0.0 to +2.4 | Sufficient evidence | +2.5 | -1.4 | +6.4range +5.6 to +7.1 | 3,877 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | UT Arlington | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.1 | -1.0 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | -0.8 | +3.3range +2.8 to +3.9 | 2,651 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Chattanooga | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.2 | -2.2 to -0.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -1.4 | +0.9range +0.6 to +1.2 | 907 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 36:59 | 36:12 | 25:01–40:00 | |
| Points | 22.0 | 17.6 | 5.0–36.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 61.5% | 49.6% | 0.0%–80.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-04 | Northern Ky. | L 84–85 | 37:48 | 36 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 12-26 | 10-20 | 2-3 | 65.4% |
| 2026-02-28 | Detroit Mercy | L 89–95 | 39:11 | 19 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4-10 | 2-8 | 9-10 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | IU Indy | W 86–74 | 33:57 | 19 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-9 | 2-3 | 7-7 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-22 | Milwaukee | W 81–70 | 34:01 | 20 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-10 | 4-8 | 4-6 | 80.0% |
| 2026-02-20 | Green Bay | L 68–73 | 40:00 | 16 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-11 | 2-8 | 6-6 | 45.5% |
| 2026-02-15 | Robert Morris | L 69–93 | 33:30 | 16 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5-11 | 1-5 | 5-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | Youngstown St. | L 82–86 | 39:59 | 16 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4-16 | 3-8 | 5-5 | 34.4% |
| 2026-02-04 | Cleveland St. | L 78–91 | 39:55 | 22 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-13 | 2-8 | 10-12 | 46.2% |
| 2026-02-01 | Northern Ky. | W 76–65 | 39:25 | 21 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-16 | 2-7 | 9-11 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-28 | Purdue Fort Wayne | W 74–65 | 33:36 | 13 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2-8 | 2-6 | 7-10 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | Detroit Mercy | W 95–87 | 39:37 | 24 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-12 | 3-8 | 9-9 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-21 | IU Indy | L 85–103 | 37:07 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-11 | 2-5 | 5-7 | 36.4% |
| 2026-01-18 | Green Bay | W 88–63 | 34:42 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-8 | 0-4 | 4-6 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-15 | Milwaukee | W 73–60 | 38:10 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 2-7 | 1-5 | 12-14 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-11 | Wright St. | L 84–94 | 39:49 | 35 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9-15 | 4-10 | 13-15 | 73.3% |
| 2026-01-09 | Cleveland St. | W 97–74 | 30:36 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-12 | 2-7 | 5-7 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-04 | Robert Morris | W 96–73 | 34:42 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-6 | 1-4 | 8-8 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-01 | Youngstown St. | W 85–83 | 37:55 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 3-4 | 35.7% |
| 2025-12-29 | Wright St. | L 73–88 | 38:04 | 27 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 6-12 | 5-8 | 10-13 | 70.8% |
| 2025-12-20 | Michigan St. | L 70–79 | 39:34 | 13 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-10 | 3-6 | 2-3 | 55.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Northern Ky. | W 82–77 | 37:21 | 16 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 3-8 | 2-6 | 8-8 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | UNI | L 63–75 | 37:02 | 12 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4-10 | 0-3 | 4-6 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Toledo | W 98–97 | 36:45 | 19 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8-14 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 67.9% |
| 2025-12-03 | Purdue Fort Wayne | W 101–92 | 34:46 | 27 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7-12 | 4-8 | 9-14 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | Montana | W 95–87 | 38:06 | 23 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4-10 | 2-6 | 13-18 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Lamar University | W 83–68 | 35:53 | 12 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-8 | 0-5 | 6-9 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-21 | Eastern Mich. | L 91–97 | 32:17 | 22 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-11 | 4-6 | 6-9 | 72.7% |
| 2025-11-17 | UCF | L 83–87 | 33:12 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-8 | 3-4 | 9-11 | 68.8% |
| 2025-11-12 | Houston | L 45–78 | 25:01 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0-6 | 0-3 | 5-5 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | Purdue | L 77–87 | 34:54 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-12 | 2-7 | 1-2 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-03 | Michigan | L 78–121 | 35:15 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-8 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 56.3% |