Dre Kindell
Wichita St. · 2025–26 · 35 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
589:17 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 35
- Minutes per game
- 16:50
- Points per game
- 5.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.6 / 2.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.7 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.5 | 3.8 | 5.3 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 4.3 |
| Season totals | 199 | 56 | 78 | 22 | 4 | 35 | 64 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 64–146 | 43.8% | 4.2 | 9.9 |
| 2P | 53–113 | 46.9% | 3.2 | 7.7 |
| 3P | 11–33 | 33.3%† | 0.9 | 2.2 |
| FT | 60–75 | 80.0% | 2.1 | 5.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.6% | 55.6% | 22.6% | 51.4% | 2.23 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Wichita St · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $31K
- 80% range $7K to $91K
- Median share of team pool
- 4.9%
- team pool $775K, 80% range $345K to $1.75M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $30K to $36K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $6K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 40.1%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Wichita St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Wichita St | $31Kspeculative | $7K to $91K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.3 | -1.1 to +1.5 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | -0.7 | +2.8range +2.4 to +3.2 | 1,837 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 10:15 | 16:50 | 6:39–26:01 | |
| Points | 4.2 | 5.7 | 0.0–19.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 29.3% | 45.7% | 0.0%–112.5% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-24 | Tulsa | L 79–83 | 11:17 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-03-22 | Oklahoma St. | W 96–70 | 16:02 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 57.1% |
| 2026-03-17 | Wyoming | W 74–70 | 8:01 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-15 | South Fla. | L 55–70 | 6:44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-14 | Tulsa | W 81–68 | 9:10 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-03-07 | Fla. Atlantic | W 88–70 | 20:09 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 14.3% |
| 2026-03-01 | UTSA | W 84–67 | 14:38 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-26 | Memphis | W 88–82 | 18:20 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-21 | Temple | W 69–57 | 13:28 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | East Carolina | W 92–89 | 8:48 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Tulsa | W 81–77 | 6:39 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-11 | South Fla. | L 58–66 | 8:28 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-08 | Tulane | W 75–61 | 22:06 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Charlotte | W 74–64 | 17:28 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-01 | Tulsa | L 83–93 | 19:29 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 6-8 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | Memphis | W 74–59 | 13:02 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | East Carolina | W 77–60 | 9:45 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-18 | South Fla. | W 86–85 | 18:52 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Fla. Atlantic | L 67–85 | 23:18 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 3-9 | 1-3 | 5-6 | 38.9% |
| 2026-01-11 | North Texas | W 78–67 | 13:19 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Rice | L 64–66 | 14:38 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Charlotte | L 100–104 | 15:15 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | UAB | W 75–70 | 19:30 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | Eastern Ky. | W 88–57 | 23:00 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-17 · NCAA | Wofford | W 84–73 | 22:42 | 19 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-6 | 1-1 | 8-9 | 91.7% |
| 2025-12-13 | DePaul | L 58–61 | 25:06 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-1 | 4-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | UNI | W 74–69 | 22:01 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 5-5 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-28 | Western Ky. | L 70–75 | 15:44 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-27 | Colorado St. | L 70–76 | 24:42 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2-6 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-26 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 65–70 | 21:36 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4-4 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 112.5% |
| 2025-11-22 | Milwaukee | W 75–58 | 13:57 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | Boise St. | L 59–62 | 21:47 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-9 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 22.2% |
| 2025-11-13 | Loyola Chicago | W 95–74 | 26:01 | 12 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-14 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-08 | Prairie View | W 105–62 | 19:53 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-04 | UNC Asheville | W 75–58 | 24:22 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 66.7% |