Dillon Battie
Wichita St. · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
529:57 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 17:40
- Points per game
- 7.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.8 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.6 | 4.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 17.3 | 10.8 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 3.5 |
| Season totals | 229 | 143 | 22 | 21 | 11 | 27 | 47 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 82–149 | 55.0% | 5.0 | 11.2 |
| 2P | 79–133 | 59.4% | 4.4 | 10.0 |
| 3P | 3–16 | 18.8%† | 0.5 | 1.2 |
| FT | 62–101 | 61.4% | 3.4 | 7.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56.0% | 59.2% | 10.7% | 67.8% | 0.81 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Wichita St · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $62K
- 80% range $24K to $155K
- Median share of team pool
- 8.4%
- team pool $775K, 80% range $345K to $1.75M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $59K to $71K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $6K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 40.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Wichita St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Wichita St | $62Kspeculative | $24K to $155K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.4 | +1.2 to +3.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +2.3 | +3.4range +3.1 to +3.8 | 1,863 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Temple | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.7 | +1.8 to +3.7 | Limited evidence | +1.7 | +1.1 | +0.9range +0.8 to +1.0 | 504 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 19:55 | 17:40 | 2:31–30:15 | |
| Points | 10.4 | 7.6 | 0.0–22.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 47.4% | 46.4% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-24 | Tulsa | L 79–83 | 15:58 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 7-7 | 71.4% |
| 2026-03-22 | Oklahoma St. | W 96–70 | 19:33 | 12 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 55.6% |
| 2026-03-17 | Wyoming | W 74–70 | 21:46 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-7 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 28.6% |
| 2026-03-15 | South Fla. | L 55–70 | 27:28 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-8 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 81.3% |
| 2026-03-14 | Tulsa | W 81–68 | 14:52 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Fla. Atlantic | W 88–70 | 28:47 | 22 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-10 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 95.0% |
| 2026-03-01 | UTSA | W 84–67 | 18:32 | 13 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 9-11 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | Memphis | W 88–82 | 14:24 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 6-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Temple | W 69–57 | 14:17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | East Carolina | W 92–89 | 14:38 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Tulsa | W 81–77 | 23:43 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 85.7% |
| 2026-02-11 | South Fla. | L 58–66 | 28:38 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-08 | Tulane | W 75–61 | 26:22 | 19 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 80.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Charlotte | W 74–64 | 17:25 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-01 | Tulsa | L 83–93 | 14:43 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Memphis | W 74–59 | 24:27 | 13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6-11 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 59.1% |
| 2026-01-21 | East Carolina | W 77–60 | 17:29 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-18 | South Fla. | W 86–85 | 28:40 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 1-5 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-15 | Fla. Atlantic | L 67–85 | 25:30 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-11 | North Texas | W 78–67 | 30:15 | 10 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Rice | L 64–66 | 11:37 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Charlotte | L 100–104 | 16:43 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | UAB | W 75–70 | 10:00 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | Eastern Ky. | W 88–57 | 9:57 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | DePaul | L 58–61 | 6:12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | UNI | W 74–69 | 3:21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-11-22 | Milwaukee | W 75–58 | 4:14 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-13 | Loyola Chicago | W 95–74 | 2:31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | — |
| 2025-11-08 | Prairie View | W 105–62 | 19:14 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-04 | UNC Asheville | W 75–58 | 18:41 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 33.3% |