DJ Patrick
UNC Asheville · 2025–26 · 27 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
919:01 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 27
- Minutes per game
- 34:02
- Points per game
- 9.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.9 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.4 | 3.9 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 2.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.1 | 4.6 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 3.2 |
| Season totals | 254 | 105 | 19 | 24 | 9 | 24 | 73 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 81–207 | 39.1% | 7.7 | 9.0 |
| 2P | 17–49 | 34.7%† | 1.8 | 2.1 |
| 3P | 64–158 | 40.5% | 5.9 | 6.9 |
| FT | 28–35 | 80.0% | 1.3 | 1.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.6% | 57.1% | 76.3% | 16.9% | 0.79 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UNC Asheville · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $25K
- 80% range $8K to $73K
- Median share of team pool
- 16.2%
- team pool $160K, 80% range $57K to $425K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $24K to $30K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 76.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UNC Asheville: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UNC Asheville | $25Kspeculative | $8K to $73K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.0 | +0.3 to +1.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | +0.7 | +4.8range +4.4 to +5.2 | 2,823 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Charleston So | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.5 | -0.2 to +1.4 | Limited evidence | +0.7 | -0.1 | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.4 | 343 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2024 | Charleston So | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.1 | -2.3 to +0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -1.5 | +0.4 | +1.4range +1.0 to +1.8 | 1,833 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | South Florida | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.8 | -1.8 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.6 | -0.2 | Not computed for this season | 1,256 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 28:30 | 34:02 | 3:55–42:53 | |
| Points | 7.2 | 9.4 | 0.0–24.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 32.8% | 47.4% | 0.0%–81.8% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-07 | High Point | L 71–75 | 3:55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Charleston So. | L 75–92 | 25:18 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | Gardner-Webb | W 77–71 | 38:50 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-10 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Radford | W 74–73 | 39:47 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-8 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 31.3% |
| 2026-02-19 | High Point | L 48–74 | 34:41 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-12 | 5-10 | 2-2 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-14 | Presbyterian | L 57–58 | 40:00 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-10 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | Longwood | W 79–74 | 37:45 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | USC Upstate | W 76–67 | 38:04 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4-10 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Winthrop | L 71–84 | 37:16 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1-6 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-29 | Gardner-Webb | W 69–50 | 37:20 | 16 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5-10 | 5-10 | 1-3 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | USC Upstate | W 83–69 | 37:34 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-7 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 78.6% |
| 2026-01-17 | Winthrop | L 67–69 | 34:37 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0-7 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Presbyterian | L 70–71 | 37:51 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 31.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | Radford | W 91–72 | 35:07 | 24 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8-16 | 7-14 | 1-1 | 71.9% |
| 2026-01-07 | Longwood | W 72–61 | 38:00 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-11 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 81.8% |
| 2026-01-03 | Charleston So. | L 83–86 | 40:00 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1-5 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 30.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | High Point | L 69–87 | 22:19 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4-6 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | UAB | L 47–72 | 33:36 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-12 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | St. Thomas (MN) | L 59–80 | 38:18 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-10 | Miami (OH) | L 87–90 | 42:53 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-9 | 2-5 | 6-6 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | NC State | L 63–75 | 34:22 | 15 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-11 | 5-10 | 0-0 | 68.2% |
| 2025-12-02 | UNC Greensboro | W 82–77 | 40:00 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-9 | 4-8 | 5-6 | 77.8% |
| 2025-11-30 | App State | W 67–55 | 38:12 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | Tennessee St. | L 73–75 | 37:38 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-5 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 80.0% |
| 2025-11-19 | Western Caro. | L 73–80 | 30:02 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-6 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Ga. Southern | L 90–93 | 5:39 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-04 | Wichita St. | L 58–75 | 39:57 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-10 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 65.0% |