DJ Patrick
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1946:58 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 77
- Minutes per game
- 25:17
- Points per game
- 7.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.9 / 0.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.0 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.1 | 4.5 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 3.3 |
| Season totals | 540 | 221 | 59 | 38 | 17 | 57 | 159 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 179–519 | 34.5% | 6.7 | 10.7 |
| 2P | 48–143 | 33.6% | 1.9 | 2.9 |
| 3P | 131–376 | 34.8% | 4.9 | 7.7 |
| FT | 51–71 | 71.8% | 0.9 | 1.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.1% | 49.1% | 72.4% | 13.7% | 1.04 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 DJ Patrick | South Florida | 26 | 14:43 | 4.4 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 12.0 | 32.6% | 50.0%† | 44.7% |
| 2023 DJ Patrick | South Florida | 4Few games | 5:34 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 5.4 | 0.0%† | 50.0%† | 25.5%† |
| 2024 DJ Patrick | Charleston So | 17 | 31:03 | 7.9 | 3.7 | 1.4 | 10.2 | 28.3% | 66.7%† | 41.0% |
| 2025 DJ Patrick | Charleston So | 3Few games | 31:41 | 11.3 | 5.0 | 0.7 | 14.3 | 37.5%† | 75.0%† | 57.1%† |
| 2026 DJ Patrick | UNC Asheville | 27 | 34:02 | 9.4 | 3.9 | 0.7 | 11.1 | 40.5% | 80.0% | 57.1% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UNC Asheville · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $25K
- 80% range $8K to $73K
- Median share of team pool
- 16.2%
- team pool $160K, 80% range $57K to $425K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $24K to $30K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 76.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UNC Asheville: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UNC Asheville | $25Kspeculative | $8K to $73K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.0 | +0.3 to +1.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | +0.7 | +4.8range +4.4 to +5.2 | 2,823 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Charleston So | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.5 | -0.2 to +1.4 | Limited evidence | +0.7 | -0.1 | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.4 | 343 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2024 | Charleston So | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.1 | -2.3 to +0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -1.5 | +0.4 | +1.4range +1.0 to +1.8 | 1,833 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2022 | South Florida | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.8 | -1.8 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.6 | -0.2 | Not computed for this season | 1,256 | ||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology