Tavarus Webb
Ga. Southern · 2025–26 · 35 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season
Logged performance
1141:20 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 35
- Minutes per game
- 32:37
- Points per game
- 15.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.7 / 2.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 15.5 | 4.7 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 2.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.0 | 5.8 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 3.5 |
| Season totals | 543 | 165 | 80 | 57 | 22 | 59 | 100 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 174–349 | 49.9% | 10.0 | 12.2 |
| 2P | 132–219 | 60.3% | 6.3 | 7.7 |
| 3P | 42–130 | 32.3% | 3.7 | 4.6 |
| FT | 153–188 | 81.4% | 5.4 | 6.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.9% | 62.9% | 37.2% | 53.9% | 1.36 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Ga Southern · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $38K
- 80% range $7K to $115K
- Median share of team pool
- 15.2%
- team pool $285K, 80% range $105K to $735K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $33K to $40K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 80.6%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Ga Southern: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Ga Southern | $38Kspeculative | $7K to $115K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.5 | -0.8 to +1.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.6 | -1.1 | +6.8range +5.8 to +7.5 | 3,364 | Prior built from the box-score line only, without a prior-season value. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 35:15 | 32:37 | 14:25–42:53 | |
| Points | 15.0 | 15.5 | 2.0–32.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 55.0% | 54.9% | 0.0%–107.1% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-09 | Troy | L 61–77 | 37:21 | 16 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-11 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 54.5% |
| 2026-03-08 | Marshall | W 82–78 | 36:48 | 31 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8-14 | 2-6 | 13-14 | 64.3% |
| 2026-03-07 | Coastal Carolina | W 96–72 | 33:41 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 68.8% |
| 2026-03-06 | South Alabama | W 94–85 | 34:15 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 37.5% |
| 2026-03-05 | Arkansas St. | W 80–77 | 34:11 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 5-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-04 | Old Dominion | W 88–84 | 38:37 | 29 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9-15 | 2-6 | 9-12 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-27 | Marshall | W 99–82 | 14:25 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | James Madison | L 66–82 | 27:55 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2026-02-21 | App State | L 74–89 | 39:04 | 21 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-13 | 1-3 | 6-6 | 57.7% |
| 2026-02-19 | Georgia St. | L 64–66 | 39:08 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2-10 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Marshall | W 101–87 | 35:52 | 18 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4-11 | 1-6 | 9-9 | 40.9% |
| 2026-02-11 | App State | L 65–81 | 35:44 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-11 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Texas St. | L 71–77 | 33:15 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6-12 | 1-4 | 3-4 | 54.2% |
| 2026-01-31 | Louisiana | L 60–69 | 36:16 | 18 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 7-11 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 72.7% |
| 2026-01-30 · NCAA | ULM | W 79–76 | 27:42 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 7-8 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Troy | L 78–83 | 35:03 | 17 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-8 | 3-5 | 4-4 | 81.3% |
| 2026-01-22 | Arkansas St. | L 68–85 | 26:23 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 6-11 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 63.6% |
| 2026-01-17 | Coastal Carolina | L 75–79 | 36:23 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3-10 | 0-2 | 3-6 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Old Dominion | W 87–84 | 35:14 | 19 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 6-7 | 1-1 | 6-8 | 92.9% |
| 2026-01-10 | South Alabama | L 71–87 | 30:14 | 15 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6-10 | 1-5 | 2-4 | 65.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Old Dominion | W 93–86 | 36:22 | 16 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5-11 | 0-2 | 6-8 | 45.5% |
| 2026-01-01 | Coastal Carolina | W 82–81 | 42:53 | 19 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5-8 | 1-3 | 8-12 | 68.8% |
| 2025-12-20 | James Madison | W 96–92 | 35:59 | 22 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7-13 | 2-3 | 6-8 | 61.5% |
| 2025-12-18 | Georgia St. | W 90–67 | 32:25 | 16 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-12 | 2-7 | 8-8 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | West Ga. | W 91–85 | 27:44 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6-13 | 1-3 | 7-7 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Gardner-Webb | W 88–84 | 34:38 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5-14 | 0-2 | 4-5 | 35.7% |
| 2025-12-03 | Louisiana Tech | W 77–69 | 33:30 | 32 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 13-14 | 4-5 | 2-4 | 107.1% |
| 2025-11-29 | Houston Christian | W 80–62 | 28:22 | 19 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8-13 | 1-2 | 2-5 | 65.4% |
| 2025-11-25 | UTSA | L 64–77 | 31:55 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-10 | 0-3 | 6-9 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Youngstown St. | L 61–67 | 31:21 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0-5 | 0-4 | 4-4 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Florida St. | L 72–98 | 23:12 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 28.6% |
| 2025-11-18 | Georgia Tech | L 66–68 | 28:22 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-10 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | FGCU | W 95–94 | 32:03 | 17 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 6-7 | 91.7% |
| 2025-11-08 | UNC Asheville | W 93–90 | 32:48 | 25 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9-15 | 2-5 | 5-5 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-04 | East Carolina | L 89–92 | 22:15 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5-10 | 0-2 | 6-7 | 50.0% |