Caden Diggs
UMBC · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
687:22 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 22:55
- Points per game
- 10.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.7 / 0.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.3 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 17.9 | 6.4 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 2.8 |
| Season totals | 308 | 110 | 28 | 20 | 10 | 37 | 48 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 117–239 | 49.0% | 8.0 | 13.9 |
| 2P | 92–169 | 54.4% | 5.6 | 9.8 |
| 3P | 25–70 | 35.7% | 2.3 | 4.1 |
| FT | 49–65 | 75.4% | 2.2 | 3.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.2% | 57.5% | 29.3% | 27.2% | 0.76 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UMBC · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $0 (assumed opted out)
- 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data)
- Tier
- Low and other
- low evidence
This school did not opt in to House-settlement revenue sharing (Sportico, 2025-07-18), so its modelled pool is exactly zero. Other schools may also have opted out; they are treated as opted in. Assumption "opt-out list": one press article names schools that did not opt in; it is unverified and other schools may differ. Speculative, not observed pay.
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UMBC: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UMBC | $0 (assumed opted out) | 80% range $0 to $0 (assumption, not data) | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.9 | -0.1 to +2.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | -0.3 | +3.0range +2.6 to +3.4 | 2,000 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Old Dominion | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.9 | -3.1 to -0.9 | Sufficient evidence | -0.6 | -1.3 | +1.0range +0.7 to +1.2 | 1,021 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 22:56 | 22:55 | 10:05–32:36 | |
| Points | 10.4 | 10.3 | 2.0–19.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 57.2% | 54.2% | 16.7%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-17 | Howard | L 83–86 | 30:30 | 15 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6-11 | 0-2 | 3-5 | 54.5% |
| 2026-03-14 | Vermont | W 74–59 | 25:07 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 60.0% |
| 2026-03-10 | UMass Lowell | W 91–69 | 20:03 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-10 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 55.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | New Hampshire | W 84–69 | 22:28 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-7 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | NJIT | W 91–52 | 16:30 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-28 | UMass Lowell | W 84–60 | 18:51 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | Bryant | W 70–58 | 20:16 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 16.7% |
| 2026-02-21 | UAlbany | W 66–62 | 22:45 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-11 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 45.5% |
| 2026-02-19 | Vermont | W 75–62 | 25:39 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | New Hampshire | W 85–63 | 20:51 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-9 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2026-02-12 | Maine | W 78–62 | 21:03 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6-10 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 65.0% |
| 2026-02-05 | Binghamton | W 79–62 | 16:38 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | UAlbany | W 68–65 | 24:08 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | Vermont | L 55–64 | 28:36 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-24 | UMass Lowell | W 79–56 | 18:07 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | NJIT | W 87–74 | 23:29 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-12 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-19 | Binghamton | W 78–60 | 25:49 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-11 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 63.6% |
| 2026-01-15 | Bryant | L 74–79 | 30:22 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 4-4 | 71.4% |
| 2026-01-10 | New Hampshire | W 75–74 | 23:42 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3-8 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | Maine | W 69–62 | 22:59 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 72.2% |
| 2025-12-29 | Coppin St. | W 93–59 | 32:35 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-9 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 38.9% |
| 2025-12-21 | South Fla. | L 69–94 | 22:21 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-12 | Army West Point | L 60–63 | 24:19 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4-9 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 55.6% |
| 2025-12-09 | Buffalo | L 79–83 | 23:28 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7-9 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 94.4% |
| 2025-12-06 | Bucknell | W 73–66 | 25:34 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-03 | Georgetown | L 81–90 | 21:18 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-8 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-29 | Delaware St. | W 71–57 | 18:55 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-19 | George Washington | L 52–89 | 18:18 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3-9 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-16 · NCAA | Wagner | W 71–70 | 32:36 | 14 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-13 | 0-5 | 4-6 | 38.5% |
| 2025-11-11 | Morgan St. | W 81–79 | 10:05 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |