Marial Akuentok
Texas Tech · 2025–26 · 15 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
89:48 minutes logged Under 100 minutes
- Games logged
- 15
- Minutes per game
- 5:59
- Points per game
- 1.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.7 / 0.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 1.1 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 7.6 | 11.1 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 8.9 |
| Season totals | 17 | 25 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 20 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 6–12 | 50.0%† | 0.8 | 5.3 |
| 2P | 5–11 | 45.5%† | 0.7 | 4.9 |
| 3P | 1–1 | 100.0%† | 0.1 | 0.4 |
| FT | 4–13 | 30.8%† | 0.9 | 5.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.2%† | 48.0%† | 8.3%† | 108.3%† | 0.50 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Texas Tech · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $36K
- 80% range $18K to $64K
- Median share of team pool
- 1.0%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $5.00M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $36K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 7.1%
- Limited evidence
- Limited evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Texas Tech: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Texas Tech | $36Kspeculative | $18K to $64K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.7 | -2.5 to -0.9 | Limited evidence | -0.6 | -1.1 | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.4 | 307 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 4:09 | 5:59 | 0:19–17:28 | |
| Points | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.0–7.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 50.0% | 45.7% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-22 | Alabama | L 65–90 | 1:57 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | — |
| 2026-03-20 | Akron | W 91–71 | 0:19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-03-12 | Iowa St. | L 53–75 | 2:47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-03-07 | BYU | L 76–82 | 13:01 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | TCU | L 65–73 | 2:40 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-28 | Iowa St. | W 82–73 | 3:27 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-24 | Cincinnati | W 80–68 | 5:32 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Kansas St. | W 100–72 | 16:12 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-20 | Baylor | W 92–73 | 4:58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-14 | Utah | W 88–74 | 1:23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-10 | Colorado | W 73–71 | 3:18 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Purdue | L 56–86 | 4:33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-11-11 | Illinois | L 77–81 | 5:30 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | Sam Houston | W 98–77 | 6:43 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-04 | Lindenwood | W 98–60 | 17:28 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 70.0% |