Tarris Reed Jr.
UConn · 2025–26 · 35 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
951:58 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 35
- Minutes per game
- 27:12
- Points per game
- 14.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 9.0 / 2.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.7 | 9.0 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 2.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 21.6 | 13.2 | 3.4 | 1.3 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 4.3 |
| Season totals | 515 | 314 | 80 | 32 | 69 | 65 | 103 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 210–346 | 60.7% | 9.9 | 14.5 |
| 2P | 210–342 | 61.4% | 9.8 | 14.4 |
| 3P | 0–4 | 0.0%† | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| FT | 95–154 | 61.7% | 4.4 | 6.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60.7% | 62.2% | 1.2% | 44.5% | 1.23 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Connecticut · Big East and Gonzaga · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $765K
- 80% range $395K to $1.40M
- Median share of team pool
- 15.8%
- team pool $4.60M, 80% range $2.55M to $8.05M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $665K to $820K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $31K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 60.8%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Connecticut: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Connecticut | $765Kspeculative | $395K to $1.40M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +6.2 | +4.7 to +7.5 | Sufficient evidence | +2.9 | +3.3 | +7.0range +6.3 to +7.6 | 2,888 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Connecticut | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +4.6 | +3.4 to +5.7 | Sufficient evidence | +2.2 | +2.4 | +3.9range +3.5 to +4.4 | 1,962 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Michigan | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.5 | -2.8 to -0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -1.6 | +0.1 | +1.8range +1.3 to +2.4 | 2,530 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Michigan | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.0 | -1.3 to +0.8 | Sufficient evidence | -1.2 | +1.2 | +1.4range +1.1 to +1.7 | 1,279 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 32:33 | 27:12 | 14:56–36:10 | |
| Points | 17.2 | 14.7 | 2.0–31.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 46.7% | 60.7% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-06 | Michigan | L 63–69 | 33:16 | 13 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4-12 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 33.3% |
| 2026-04-04 | Illinois | W 71–62 | 34:41 | 17 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-29 | Duke | W 73–72 | 33:11 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 10-16 | 0-0 | 6-9 | 62.5% |
| 2026-03-27 | Michigan St. | W 67–63 | 33:01 | 20 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8-16 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-22 | UCLA | W 73–57 | 28:38 | 10 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 37.5% |
| 2026-03-20 | Furman | W 82–71 | 34:28 | 31 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 12-15 | 0-0 | 7-9 | 80.0% |
| 2026-03-14 | St. John's (NY) | L 52–72 | 29:43 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8-17 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 47.1% |
| 2026-03-13 | Georgetown | W 67–51 | 22:39 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-12 | Xavier | W 93–68 | 26:47 | 17 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8-12 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 66.7% |
| 2026-03-07 | Marquette | L 62–68 | 28:56 | 16 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Seton Hall | W 71–67 | 32:22 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 4-8 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-25 | St. John's (NY) | W 72–40 | 30:14 | 20 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 9-14 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 64.3% |
| 2026-02-21 | Villanova | W 73–63 | 22:25 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Creighton | L 84–91 | 26:23 | 15 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7-11 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 63.6% |
| 2026-02-14 | Georgetown | W 79–75 | 17:00 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | Butler | W 80–70 | 30:22 | 16 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-06 | St. John's (NY) | L 72–81 | 34:41 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 5-10 | 0-0 | 2-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-03 | Xavier | W 92–60 | 22:02 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Creighton | W 85–58 | 21:11 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-27 | Providence | W 87–81 | 18:58 | 19 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 3-9 | 88.9% |
| 2026-01-24 | Villanova | W 75–67 | 30:51 | 10 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-17 | Georgetown | W 64–62 | 29:37 | 15 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 5-11 | 0-1 | 5-5 | 45.5% |
| 2026-01-13 | Seton Hall | W 69–64 | 33:15 | 21 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8-13 | 0-1 | 5-13 | 61.5% |
| 2026-01-10 | DePaul | W 72–60 | 23:42 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Providence | W 103–98 | 36:10 | 20 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8-13 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 61.5% |
| 2026-01-04 | Marquette | W 73–57 | 24:07 | 13 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-31 | Xavier | W 90–67 | 21:25 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 57.1% |
| 2025-12-21 | DePaul | W 72–54 | 27:18 | 14 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 58.3% |
| 2025-12-16 · NCAA | Butler | W 79–60 | 21:00 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 8-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-12 | Texas | W 71–63 | 29:10 | 12 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 71.4% |
| 2025-12-09 | Florida | W 77–73 | 24:12 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5-10 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-28 | Illinois | W 74–61 | 14:56 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | BYU | W 86–84 | 33:38 | 21 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 5-9 | 80.0% |
| 2025-11-10 | Columbia | W 89–62 | 24:02 | 19 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6-9 | 0-1 | 7-10 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-07 | UMass Lowell | W 110–47 | 17:37 | 20 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 9-12 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 75.0% |