Nathan Claerbaut
Central Mich. · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
854:00 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 29:27
- Points per game
- 11.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.3 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.7 | 5.3 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.9 | 7.2 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 340 | 154 | 43 | 12 | 59 | 41 | 61 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 147–259 | 56.8% | 8.9 | 12.1 |
| 2P | 147–253 | 58.1% | 8.7 | 11.9 |
| 3P | 0–6 | 0.0%† | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| FT | 46–68 | 67.6% | 2.3 | 3.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56.8% | 58.8% | 2.3% | 26.3% | 1.05 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
C Michigan · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $48K
- 80% range $8K to $160K
- Median share of team pool
- 17.3%
- team pool $270K, 80% range $100K to $730K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $42K to $51K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 74.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
C Michigan: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | C Michigan | $48Kspeculative | $8K to $160K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.1 | -1.2 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | -0.2 | +3.7range +3.3 to +4.2 | 2,557 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 31:07 | 29:27 | 18:26–35:16 | |
| Points | 11.8 | 11.7 | 4.0–20.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 63.0% | 57.1% | 14.3%–90.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | Ball St. | L 69–85 | 31:57 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 70.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Akron | L 64–77 | 30:32 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 71.4% |
| 2026-02-28 | Buffalo | W 75–70 | 29:41 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 5-10 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | Kent St. | L 81–83 | 31:01 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 57.1% |
| 2026-02-21 | Western Mich. | W 83–70 | 32:25 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-17 | Eastern Mich. | L 54–66 | 31:12 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-11 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 45.5% |
| 2026-02-14 | NIU | W 88–46 | 28:07 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7-12 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 58.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | Louisiana | L 80–85 | 24:56 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-03 | Massachusetts | L 89–95 | 31:02 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Bowling Green | W 62–59 | 33:17 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-27 | Eastern Mich. | W 100–65 | 30:35 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7-14 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Western Mich. | L 65–77 | 27:25 | 17 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7-13 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 53.8% |
| 2026-01-20 | Ball St. | L 67–68 | 32:25 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-13 | Miami (OH) | L 61–100 | 27:44 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8-13 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 61.5% |
| 2026-01-10 | Kent St. | W 87–85 | 24:06 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-06 | Akron | L 69–82 | 34:09 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 7-7 | 28.6% |
| 2026-01-03 | Toledo | L 75–78 | 27:25 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-30 | Ohio | L 64–80 | 29:36 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | Wisconsin | L 61–88 | 27:13 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 71.4% |
| 2025-12-20 | NIU | L 73–74 | 31:55 | 18 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 8-14 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 57.1% |
| 2025-12-13 | Stony Brook | L 55–78 | 27:38 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3-8 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-07 | Saint Louis | L 65–107 | 32:03 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5-11 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 45.5% |
| 2025-12-02 | Loyola Chicago | L 72–83 | 35:16 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-22 | Marquette | L 71–85 | 34:39 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6-14 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-20 | Northern Ky. | L 66–90 | 27:44 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 71.4% |
| 2025-11-14 | Coppin St. | W 82–59 | 27:51 | 20 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9-10 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 90.0% |
| 2025-11-13 | South Alabama | L 64–66 | 29:43 | 12 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-08 | Bradley | L 54–85 | 18:26 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-03 | App State | W 82–66 | 23:57 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 14.3% |