Jadin Booth
Samford · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1051:24 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 36:15
- Points per game
- 21.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.7 / 2.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 21.7 | 3.7 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 23.9 | 4.0 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| Season totals | 629 | 106 | 63 | 33 | 2 | 46 | 64 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 188–418 | 45.0% | 14.4 | 15.9 |
| 2P | 67–136 | 49.3% | 4.7 | 5.2 |
| 3P | 121–282 | 42.9% | 9.7 | 10.7 |
| FT | 132–152 | 86.8% | 5.2 | 5.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59.4% | 64.9% | 67.5% | 36.4% | 1.37 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Samford · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $41K
- 80% range $13K to $120K
- Median share of team pool
- 17.6%
- team pool $250K, 80% range $93K to $665K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $39K to $48K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 86.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Samford: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Samford | $41Kspeculative | $13K to $120K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.5 | +0.6 to +2.5 | Sufficient evidence | +2.2 | -0.7 | +6.1range +5.5 to +6.7 | 3,336 | Season detail | |
| 2021 | NE Omaha | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -1.6 | -2.9 to -0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.0 | -1.6 | Not computed for this season | 1,075 | 2020-21 season, shortened by COVID-19 cancellations; kept in the model fit with this flag. |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 35:16 | 36:15 | 19:35–44:00 | |
| Points | 25.6 | 21.7 | 2.0–40.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 61.8% | 57.8% | 16.7%–92.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-07 | Furman | L 81–86 | 40:00 | 34 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 10-17 | 8-15 | 6-7 | 82.4% |
| 2026-02-28 | UNC Greensboro | W 87–78 | 39:04 | 40 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 13-28 | 11-22 | 3-3 | 66.1% |
| 2026-02-26 | VMI | W 80–61 | 37:17 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-9 | 3-9 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Mercer | L 86–89 | 19:58 | 26 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8-15 | 4-8 | 6-6 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-19 | The Citadel | W 78–75 | 40:00 | 18 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6-16 | 2-9 | 4-6 | 43.8% |
| 2026-02-14 | ETSU | W 82–72 | 44:00 | 19 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-14 | 3-9 | 8-10 | 39.3% |
| 2026-02-11 · NCAA | Wofford | W 97–80 | 36:12 | 25 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9-13 | 6-9 | 1-3 | 92.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | Mercer | W 69–49 | 28:29 | 28 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-9 | 2-4 | 14-14 | 77.8% |
| 2026-02-05 | The Citadel | W 78–64 | 36:07 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-9 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 72.2% |
| 2026-02-01 | Western Caro. | W 88–74 | 36:11 | 18 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 7-8 | 68.8% |
| 2026-01-29 | Furman | L 73–78 | 36:56 | 23 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8-21 | 4-10 | 3-4 | 47.6% |
| 2026-01-24 | Chattanooga | W 75–64 | 39:48 | 28 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 9-16 | 6-12 | 4-5 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-21 · NCAA | Wofford | L 78–88 | 39:30 | 27 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 11-21 | 4-11 | 1-1 | 61.9% |
| 2026-01-17 | ETSU | L 75–76 | 39:56 | 19 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6-14 | 5-11 | 2-2 | 60.7% |
| 2026-01-14 | Furman | L 73–77 | 39:03 | 12 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-11 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 45.5% |
| 2026-01-10 | Chattanooga | L 79–88 | 39:54 | 23 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7-17 | 4-10 | 5-7 | 52.9% |
| 2026-01-07 | Western Caro. | W 82–77 | 38:49 | 33 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 11-19 | 5-9 | 6-7 | 71.1% |
| 2026-01-03 | UNC Greensboro | L 82–89 | 36:27 | 26 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8-21 | 6-16 | 4-4 | 52.4% |
| 2026-01-01 | VMI | W 78–58 | 35:47 | 19 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-11 | 4-8 | 3-3 | 72.7% |
| 2025-12-07 | Cornell | W 93–90 | 36:46 | 30 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9-16 | 3-9 | 9-9 | 65.6% |
| 2025-12-05 | VCU | L 57–83 | 31:48 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1-9 | 1-7 | 3-4 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-26 | Utah Valley | L 45–89 | 19:35 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | New Mexico St. | L 72–81 | 33:22 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 18.8% |
| 2025-11-19 | FGCU | L 62–77 | 36:00 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7-13 | 6-11 | 7-9 | 76.9% |
| 2025-11-16 | Central Ark. | W 84–77 | 42:05 | 21 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-18 | 5-15 | 4-4 | 47.2% |
| 2025-11-14 | Arkansas | L 75–79 | 32:39 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-15 | 2-10 | 6-6 | 26.7% |
| 2025-11-12 | Texas Southern | W 93–90 | 43:25 | 23 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6-14 | 4-10 | 7-8 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-07 | South Carolina St. | W 82–72 | 37:54 | 26 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-12 | 5-10 | 9-10 | 70.8% |
| 2025-11-03 | Tulane | L 72–85 | 34:22 | 34 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10-20 | 9-17 | 5-5 | 72.5% |