Miles Ndalama
Florida A&M · 2025–26 · 23 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
533:46 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 23
- Minutes per game
- 23:12
- Points per game
- 7.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.5 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.1 | 4.5 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 3.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.3 | 7.8 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 5.6 |
| Season totals | 164 | 104 | 17 | 10 | 22 | 41 | 75 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 63–113 | 55.8% | 4.9 | 8.5 |
| 2P | 63–112 | 56.3% | 4.9 | 8.4 |
| 3P | 0–1 | 0.0%† | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| FT | 38–79 | 48.1% | 3.4 | 5.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.8% | 55.5% | 0.9% | 69.9% | 0.41 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Florida A&M · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $21K
- 80% range $5K to $72K
- Median share of team pool
- 11.8%
- team pool $175K, 80% range $64K to $470K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $20K to $22K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 45.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Florida A&M: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Florida A&M | $21Kspeculative | $5K to $72K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.5 | -0.6 to +1.7 | Sufficient evidence | -2.1 | +2.6 | +2.8range +2.4 to +3.2 | 1,874 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 22:20 | 23:12 | 12:29–31:07 | |
| Points | 5.8 | 7.1 | 0.0–17.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 35.0% | 52.0% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | Southern U. | L 70–73 | 25:22 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-11 | Jackson St. | W 70–60 | 23:49 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-05 | Bethune-Cookman | W 81–77 | 18:00 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Grambling | W 66–59 | 22:38 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 71.4% |
| 2026-02-26 | Southern U. | W 82–71 | 21:49 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-21 | Alabama St. | W 76–63 | 21:17 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 8-13 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-09 | Prairie View | W 100–96 | 23:24 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Texas Southern | L 57–62 | 21:11 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-02 | Alabama St. | L 66–79 | 27:17 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | Alabama A&M | L 65–72 | 22:40 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-26 | Jackson St. | L 65–66 | 24:37 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-6 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-24 | Alcorn | W 66–58 | 25:49 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 7-9 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 77.8% |
| 2026-01-19 | Mississippi Val. | W 62–48 | 23:04 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 71–67 | 31:07 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 3-9 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-12 | Grambling | W 91–84 | 12:29 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Southern U. | W 67–59 | 26:49 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-03 | Bethune-Cookman | L 83–87 | 25:16 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-21 | TCU | L 56–80 | 22:46 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-19 | Tarleton St. | L 54–78 | 15:27 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Jacksonville | W 72–65 | 24:48 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 2-8 | 83.3% |
| 2025-12-02 | Jacksonville | L 82–85 | 29:44 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-17 | Georgia | L 57–87 | 22:54 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 12.5% |
| 2025-11-11 | UCF | L 60–97 | 21:29 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 66.7% |