Jordan Chatman
Florida A&M · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
761:38 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 26:16
- Points per game
- 8.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.0 / 1.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 8.8 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 2.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.4 | 4.6 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 4.1 |
| Season totals | 255 | 88 | 31 | 20 | 13 | 35 | 79 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 75–190 | 39.5% | 6.6 | 10.0 |
| 2P | 25–49 | 51.0%† | 1.7 | 2.6 |
| 3P | 50–141 | 35.5% | 4.9 | 7.4 |
| FT | 55–72 | 76.4% | 2.5 | 3.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.6% | 57.5% | 74.2% | 37.9% | 0.89 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Florida A&M · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $15K
- 80% range $1K to $57K
- Median share of team pool
- 11.8%
- team pool $175K, 80% range $64K to $470K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $14K to $16K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 65.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Florida A&M: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Florida A&M | $15Kspeculative | $1K to $57K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.8 | -1.9 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | -0.8 | +3.5range +3.0 to +4.0 | 2,678 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Florida A&M | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.5 | -2.0 to +1.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | -0.6 | +2.0range +1.6 to +2.5 | 1,826 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Florida A&M | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.3 | -3.5 to -1.0 | Sufficient evidence | -1.9 | -0.4 | +1.0range +0.7 to +1.4 | 1,758 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Florida A&M | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.3 | -2.4 to -0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -1.3 | +0.0 | +0.9range +0.6 to +1.1 | 1,038 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 26:00 | 26:16 | 16:09–35:35 | |
| Points | 6.8 | 8.8 | 2.0–18.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 66.3% | 55.5% | 0.0%–150.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | Southern U. | L 70–73 | 24:33 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 150.0% |
| 2026-03-11 | Jackson St. | W 70–60 | 21:45 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3-8 | 1-6 | 1-1 | 43.8% |
| 2026-03-05 | Bethune-Cookman | W 81–77 | 28:42 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-6 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Grambling | W 66–59 | 22:11 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-26 | Southern U. | W 82–71 | 32:48 | 13 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Alabama St. | W 76–63 | 25:44 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-7 | 3-6 | 3-4 | 78.6% |
| 2026-02-19 | Alabama A&M | L 61–63 | 27:52 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-7 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 35.7% |
| 2026-02-16 | Alcorn | W 86–78 | 33:53 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-7 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 78.6% |
| 2026-02-14 | Jackson St. | L 60–80 | 27:09 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0-7 | 0-6 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-09 | Prairie View | W 100–96 | 19:05 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6-6 | 5-5 | 1-2 | 141.7% |
| 2026-02-07 | Texas Southern | L 57–62 | 23:10 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-8 | 2-8 | 3-3 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-02 | Alabama St. | L 66–79 | 25:28 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-8 | 1-6 | 2-2 | 31.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | Alabama A&M | L 65–72 | 31:15 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-6 | 3-5 | 5-6 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-26 | Jackson St. | L 65–66 | 35:35 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-12 | 3-10 | 3-6 | 54.2% |
| 2026-01-24 | Alcorn | W 66–58 | 30:15 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-19 | Mississippi Val. | W 62–48 | 27:57 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 71–67 | 27:01 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5-7 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 85.7% |
| 2026-01-12 | Grambling | W 91–84 | 20:24 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2-6 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Southern U. | W 67–59 | 29:23 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-03 | Bethune-Cookman | L 83–87 | 26:00 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-28 | Georgia Tech | L 65–89 | 22:22 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | TCU | L 56–80 | 30:00 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2-5 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-19 | Tarleton St. | L 54–78 | 31:54 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5-9 | 4-8 | 3-3 | 77.8% |
| 2025-12-17 | Jacksonville | W 72–65 | 23:33 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-7 | 1-5 | 3-6 | 35.7% |
| 2025-12-02 | Jacksonville | L 82–85 | 16:09 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-17 | Georgia | L 57–87 | 30:03 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 4-5 | 64.3% |
| 2025-11-11 | UCF | L 60–97 | 21:55 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-08 | Kennesaw St. | L 72–92 | 17:26 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-6 | 1-5 | 3-3 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-03 | South Fla. | L 67–102 | 28:06 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4-12 | 1-6 | 2-5 | 37.5% |