Jaquan Sanders
Florida A&M · 2025–26 · 28 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
885:54 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 28
- Minutes per game
- 31:38
- Points per game
- 12.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.2 / 3.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.0 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 2.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.1 | 4.1 | 4.7 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 3.1 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 335 | 90 | 105 | 28 | 5 | 68 | 64 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 104–269 | 38.7% | 9.6 | 12.1 |
| 2P | 47–103 | 45.6% | 3.7 | 4.7 |
| 3P | 57–166 | 34.3% | 5.9 | 7.5 |
| FT | 70–84 | 83.3% | 3.0 | 3.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.3% | 54.7% | 61.7% | 31.2% | 1.54 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Florida A&M · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $8K
- 80% range $1K to $42K
- Median share of team pool
- 7.9%
- team pool $175K, 80% range $64K to $470K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $8K to $9K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 75.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Florida A&M: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Florida A&M | $8Kspeculative | $1K to $42K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.7 | -2.8 to -0.6 | Sufficient evidence | -0.7 | -1.0 | +3.6range +3.1 to +4.1 | 3,099 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Hofstra | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.9 | -2.1 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -1.3 | +0.3 | +1.4range +1.1 to +1.8 | 1,139 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Seton Hall | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.1 | -2.2 to -0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | -0.9 | +0.7range +0.5 to +0.9 | 730 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 32:28 | 31:38 | 21:14–39:28 | |
| Points | 12.4 | 12.0 | 4.0–24.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 40.0% | 48.2% | 16.7%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | Southern U. | L 70–73 | 32:52 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-11 | 2-7 | 4-4 | 36.4% |
| 2026-03-11 | Jackson St. | W 70–60 | 33:12 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2-11 | 2-8 | 4-4 | 27.3% |
| 2026-03-05 | Bethune-Cookman | W 81–77 | 28:50 | 18 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5-13 | 3-6 | 5-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Grambling | W 66–59 | 34:12 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-11 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 68.2% |
| 2026-02-26 | Southern U. | W 82–71 | 33:14 | 6 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-11 | 0-5 | 2-2 | 18.2% |
| 2026-02-21 | Alabama St. | W 76–63 | 38:09 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 3-9 | 1-6 | 1-1 | 38.9% |
| 2026-02-19 | Alabama A&M | L 61–63 | 33:54 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-10 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-16 | Alcorn | W 86–78 | 32:23 | 17 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 5-10 | 3-7 | 4-4 | 65.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Jackson St. | L 60–80 | 25:47 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-09 | Prairie View | W 100–96 | 28:32 | 11 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2-6 | 1-4 | 6-8 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-07 | Texas Southern | L 57–62 | 23:07 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-02 | Alabama St. | L 66–79 | 32:18 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1-6 | 0-5 | 3-4 | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-31 | Alabama A&M | L 65–72 | 29:40 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 41.7% |
| 2026-01-26 | Jackson St. | L 65–66 | 39:28 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-12 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | Alcorn | W 66–58 | 36:38 | 13 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-9 | 3-6 | 2-3 | 61.1% |
| 2026-01-19 | Mississippi Val. | W 62–48 | 21:14 | 16 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-9 | 4-8 | 4-5 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 71–67 | 37:25 | 18 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5-11 | 4-8 | 4-4 | 63.6% |
| 2026-01-12 | Grambling | W 91–84 | 37:05 | 24 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7-15 | 4-11 | 6-6 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Southern U. | W 67–59 | 28:11 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1-6 | 1-6 | 5-6 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Bethune-Cookman | L 83–87 | 37:05 | 22 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 8-19 | 3-9 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-28 | Georgia Tech | L 65–89 | 35:38 | 20 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7-15 | 4-7 | 2-6 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | TCU | L 56–80 | 32:15 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6-9 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 77.8% |
| 2025-12-19 | Tarleton St. | L 54–78 | 24:49 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Jacksonville | W 72–65 | 36:44 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-8 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 68.8% |
| 2025-12-02 | Jacksonville | L 82–85 | 32:44 | 20 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7-10 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | UCF | L 60–97 | 22:38 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-08 | Kennesaw St. | L 72–92 | 24:40 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2-10 | 0-4 | 4-4 | 20.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | South Fla. | L 67–102 | 33:10 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2-10 | 1-8 | 2-2 | 25.0% |