Jeremiah Wilkinson
Georgia · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
795:17 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 25:39
- Points per game
- 17.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.0 / 1.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 17.4 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 27.2 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 2.6 |
| Season totals | 540 | 63 | 54 | 49 | 9 | 42 | 51 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 168–410 | 41.0% | 13.2 | 20.6 |
| 2P | 89–189 | 47.1% | 6.1 | 9.5 |
| 3P | 79–221 | 35.7% | 7.1 | 11.1 |
| FT | 125–159 | 78.6% | 5.1 | 8.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.6% | 56.3% | 53.9% | 38.8% | 1.29 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Georgia · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $330K
- 80% range $120K to $535K
- Median share of team pool
- 9.7%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $330K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 59.7%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Georgia: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Georgia | $330Kspeculative | $120K to $535K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.9 | +0.4 to +3.2 | Sufficient evidence | +2.8 | -1.0 | +4.4range +3.7 to +5.0 | 2,752 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | California | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.5 | +0.3 to +2.6 | Limited evidence | +2.2 | -0.7 | +3.6range +3.0 to +4.1 | 564 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 25:53 | 25:39 | 17:12–40:21 | |
| Points | 16.0 | 17.4 | 2.0–32.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 43.1% | 50.0% | 11.1%–81.8% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-19 | Saint Louis | L 77–102 | 29:49 | 30 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-21 | 7-15 | 5-5 | 59.5% |
| 2026-03-12 | Ole Miss | L 72–76 | 21:54 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-12 | 1-7 | 1-2 | 29.2% |
| 2026-03-07 | Mississippi St. | W 102–96 | 26:55 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-13 | 3-7 | 4-5 | 42.3% |
| 2026-03-03 | Alabama | W 98–88 | 23:58 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-12 | 1-5 | 4-4 | 20.8% |
| 2026-02-28 | South Carolina | W 87–68 | 26:49 | 18 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5-11 | 4-9 | 4-5 | 63.6% |
| 2026-02-25 | Vanderbilt | L 80–88 | 26:37 | 28 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7-12 | 5-9 | 9-11 | 79.2% |
| 2026-02-21 | Texas | W 91–80 | 25:11 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6-12 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-17 | Kentucky | W 86–78 | 25:50 | 19 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-16 | 3-8 | 4-6 | 46.9% |
| 2026-02-07 | LSU | W 83–71 | 28:02 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7-17 | 2-8 | 2-3 | 47.1% |
| 2026-01-31 | Texas A&M | L 77–92 | 36:22 | 17 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6-18 | 1-10 | 4-5 | 36.1% |
| 2026-01-28 | Tennessee | L 85–86 | 24:08 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-10 | 0-6 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Texas | L 67–87 | 31:56 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4-13 | 3-7 | 6-7 | 42.3% |
| 2026-01-20 | Missouri | W 74–72 | 32:48 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-11 | 3-7 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Arkansas | W 90–76 | 32:06 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7-16 | 4-10 | 2-2 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-14 | Ole Miss | L 95–97 | 40:21 | 32 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9-19 | 6-12 | 8-10 | 63.2% |
| 2026-01-10 | South Carolina | W 75–70 | 21:15 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 45.8% |
| 2026-01-06 | Florida | L 77–92 | 19:53 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 11.1% |
| 2026-01-03 | Auburn | W 104–100 | 35:53 | 31 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9-21 | 4-10 | 9-14 | 52.4% |
| 2025-12-29 | LIU | W 89–74 | 17:12 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-11 | 0-5 | 1-2 | 36.4% |
| 2025-12-22 | West Ga. | W 103–74 | 23:11 | 19 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-13 | 3-7 | 6-9 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-18 | Western Caro. | W 112–82 | 18:54 | 26 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-11 | 4-6 | 8-9 | 81.8% |
| 2025-12-13 | Cincinnati | W 84–65 | 24:27 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5-15 | 1-7 | 6-6 | 36.7% |
| 2025-12-02 | Florida St. | W 107–73 | 26:53 | 22 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7-13 | 4-8 | 4-6 | 69.2% |
| 2025-11-29 | Tennessee Tech | W 123–81 | 20:40 | 20 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-11 | 5-9 | 3-4 | 77.3% |
| 2025-11-23 | Clemson | L 94–97 | 27:07 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9-15 | 2-5 | 6-8 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-21 | Xavier | W 78–77 | 17:34 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 43.8% |
| 2025-11-17 | Florida A&M | W 87–57 | 23:14 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3-10 | 1-6 | 4-7 | 35.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | Georgia Tech | W 92–87 | 23:14 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-11 | 2-5 | 6-7 | 54.5% |
| 2025-11-09 | Morehead St. | W 120–81 | 20:48 | 22 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8-12 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-05 | UMES | W 94–29 | 20:21 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4-13 | 2-9 | 2-2 | 38.5% |
| 2025-11-03 | Bellarmine | W 104–59 | 21:55 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-12 | 1-5 | 4-5 | 45.8% |