Blue Cain
Georgia · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
907:53 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 27:31
- Points per game
- 13.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.1 / 2.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 13.1 | 5.1 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.0 | 7.4 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 2.3 |
| Season totals | 431 | 168 | 85 | 46 | 6 | 36 | 52 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 154–329 | 46.8% | 10.0 | 14.5 |
| 2P | 109–179 | 60.9% | 5.4 | 7.9 |
| 3P | 45–150 | 30.0% | 4.5 | 6.6 |
| FT | 78–86 | 90.7% | 2.6 | 3.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.6% | 58.7% | 45.6% | 26.1% | 2.36 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Georgia · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $530K
- 80% range $330K to $835K
- Median share of team pool
- 14.6%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $530K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 68.0%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Georgia: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Georgia | $530Kspeculative | $330K to $835K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.4 | +2.1 to +4.6 | Sufficient evidence | +3.2 | +0.2 | +5.7range +5.0 to +6.3 | 3,133 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Georgia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.1 | +0.4 to +3.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | +1.1 | +3.7range +3.1 to +4.4 | 2,676 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Georgia | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.1 | -1.4 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | -0.2 | +2.2range +1.7 to +2.9 | 2,052 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 24:58 | 27:31 | 20:51–36:18 | |
| Points | 9.6 | 13.1 | 3.0–22.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 52.2% | 53.7% | 0.0%–91.7% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-19 | Saint Louis | L 77–102 | 21:51 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-7 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 28.6% |
| 2026-03-12 | Ole Miss | L 72–76 | 22:15 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1-7 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 21.4% |
| 2026-03-07 | Mississippi St. | W 102–96 | 29:05 | 15 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-6 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 91.7% |
| 2026-03-03 | Alabama | W 98–88 | 28:18 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6-11 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 59.1% |
| 2026-02-28 | South Carolina | W 87–68 | 23:19 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-5 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | Vanderbilt | L 80–88 | 32:02 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-10 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Texas | W 91–80 | 32:47 | 12 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 64.3% |
| 2026-02-17 | Kentucky | W 86–78 | 31:54 | 20 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-9 | 3-5 | 5-5 | 83.3% |
| 2026-02-14 | Oklahoma | L 78–94 | 33:34 | 20 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9-15 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-11 | Florida | L 66–86 | 34:37 | 17 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6-15 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | LSU | W 83–71 | 28:15 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | Texas A&M | L 77–92 | 27:32 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-13 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 46.2% |
| 2026-01-28 | Tennessee | L 85–86 | 30:25 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-10 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 45.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Texas | L 67–87 | 23:57 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-20 | Missouri | W 74–72 | 32:44 | 8 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-16 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Arkansas | W 90–76 | 30:22 | 18 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8-12 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Ole Miss | L 95–97 | 20:51 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-7 | 0-4 | 3-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | South Carolina | W 75–70 | 28:08 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-11 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 36.4% |
| 2026-01-06 | Florida | L 77–92 | 29:33 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-9 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-03 | Auburn | W 104–100 | 36:18 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-10 | 0-3 | 5-5 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | LIU | W 89–74 | 23:39 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | West Ga. | W 103–74 | 22:19 | 20 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9-13 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 76.9% |
| 2025-12-18 | Western Caro. | W 112–82 | 22:52 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-10 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 55.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Cincinnati | W 84–65 | 33:15 | 22 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-12 | 0-6 | 12-14 | 41.7% |
| 2025-12-02 | Florida St. | W 107–73 | 28:14 | 17 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7-13 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 61.5% |
| 2025-11-29 | Tennessee Tech | W 123–81 | 21:43 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-9 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-23 | Clemson | L 94–97 | 35:35 | 19 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-9 | 3-6 | 6-6 | 72.2% |
| 2025-11-21 | Xavier | W 78–77 | 29:15 | 16 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-14 | 1-7 | 3-3 | 46.4% |
| 2025-11-17 | Florida A&M | W 87–57 | 22:39 | 12 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4-9 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-14 | Georgia Tech | W 92–87 | 24:53 | 18 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-10 | 2-5 | 6-7 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-09 | Morehead St. | W 120–81 | 21:36 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-10 | 2-7 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-05 | UMES | W 94–29 | 22:00 | 16 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-9 | 4-8 | 2-2 | 77.8% |
| 2025-11-03 | Bellarmine | W 104–59 | 22:06 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-11 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 68.2% |