Isaac Taveras
Southern Miss. · 2025–26 · 20 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
530:16 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 20
- Minutes per game
- 26:31
- Points per game
- 15.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.5 / 2.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 15.4 | 6.5 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 3.5 | 3.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 23.2 | 9.9 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 5.2 | 4.9 |
| Season totals | 308 | 131 | 44 | 46 | 6 | 69 | 65 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 125–240 | 52.1% | 12.0 | 18.1 |
| 2P | 120–216 | 55.6% | 10.8 | 16.3 |
| 3P | 5–24 | 20.8%† | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| FT | 53–94 | 56.4% | 4.7 | 7.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.1% | 54.7% | 10.0% | 39.2% | 0.64 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Southern Miss · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $25K
- 80% range $8K to $72K
- Median share of team pool
- 9.4%
- team pool $260K, 80% range $97K to $690K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $22K to $26K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 42.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Southern Miss: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Southern Miss | $25Kspeculative | $8K to $72K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.2 | +0.5 to +1.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | +0.5 | +3.5range +3.2 to +3.8 | 1,679 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Fresno St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.4 | -1.5 to +0.4 | Limited evidence | -0.9 | +0.5 | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.6 | 545 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 25:41 | 26:31 | 10:20–35:59 | |
| Points | 14.8 | 15.4 | 2.0–32.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 48.4% | 52.9% | 14.3%–76.7% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | Troy | L 70–78 | 35:23 | 32 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 12-16 | 0-0 | 8-13 | 75.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | App State | W 86–73 | 21:45 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 37.5% |
| 2026-03-06 | Texas St. | W 81–77 | 18:34 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 60.0% |
| 2026-03-05 | James Madison | W 86–80 | 30:22 | 17 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7-17 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 41.2% |
| 2026-02-27 | South Alabama | W 68–55 | 22:19 | 6 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 28.6% |
| 2026-02-24 | Arkansas St. | L 84–89 | 26:44 | 20 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 8-17 | 0-2 | 4-10 | 47.1% |
| 2026-02-21 | Old Dominion | W 86–81 | 34:29 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 6-12 | 1-2 | 3-6 | 54.2% |
| 2026-02-14 | Troy | W 69–65 | 33:42 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 5-16 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 31.3% |
| 2026-02-12 | South Alabama | L 78–84 | 22:58 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-07 | Kent St. | W 66–65 | 16:35 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-11 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 54.5% |
| 2025-12-18 | Louisiana | W 62–54 | 10:20 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 14.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | Ole Miss | L 67–71 | 29:22 | 20 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9-13 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 69.2% |
| 2025-12-08 | Grambling | W 68–60 | 35:17 | 18 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 8-11 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 72.7% |
| 2025-12-06 | Miami (FL) | L 64–88 | 31:59 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3-11 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 27.3% |
| 2025-12-03 | Radford | W 82–75 | 26:55 | 18 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 0-3 | 64.3% |
| 2025-11-23 | UT Martin | W 70–60 | 20:02 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 71.4% |
| 2025-11-22 | North Florida | W 92–83 | 17:20 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-11 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 54.5% |
| 2025-11-13 | Grambling | L 70–75 | 35:59 | 19 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8-22 | 0-2 | 3-8 | 36.4% |
| 2025-11-09 | South Carolina | L 79–83 | 29:15 | 25 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 10-14 | 1-3 | 4-7 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Buffalo | L 79–85 | 30:56 | 28 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 11-15 | 1-2 | 5-6 | 76.7% |