Dylan Brumfield
Southern Miss. · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1041:37 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 31:34
- Points per game
- 8.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.2 / 3.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 8.8 | 4.2 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 3.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.1 | 5.3 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 2.5 | 4.1 |
| Season totals | 289 | 139 | 99 | 42 | 10 | 65 | 107 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 95–215 | 44.2% | 6.5 | 8.3 |
| 2P | 91–192 | 47.4% | 5.8 | 7.4 |
| 3P | 4–23 | 17.4%† | 0.7 | 0.9 |
| FT | 95–127 | 74.8% | 3.8 | 4.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.1% | 53.3% | 10.7% | 59.1% | 1.52 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Southern Miss · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $30K
- 80% range $6K to $92K
- Median share of team pool
- 13.6%
- team pool $260K, 80% range $97K to $690K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $27K to $31K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 77.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Southern Miss: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Southern Miss | $30Kspeculative | $6K to $92K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.4 | -0.7 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | +0.1 | +5.7range +5.0 to +6.5 | 3,053 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 35:05 | 31:34 | 16:25–40:00 | |
| Points | 8.6 | 8.8 | 0.0–16.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 32.6% | 41.8% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | Troy | L 70–78 | 32:53 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4-10 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 40.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | App State | W 86–73 | 33:14 | 16 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5-9 | 1-1 | 5-6 | 61.1% |
| 2026-03-06 | Texas St. | W 81–77 | 38:42 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2-7 | 0-1 | 6-6 | 28.6% |
| 2026-03-05 | James Madison | W 86–80 | 35:15 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 6-8 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-27 | South Alabama | W 68–55 | 35:19 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | Arkansas St. | L 84–89 | 38:49 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Old Dominion | W 86–81 | 28:11 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Troy | W 69–65 | 37:29 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-12 | South Alabama | L 78–84 | 22:32 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Kent St. | W 66–65 | 28:48 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-04 | Marshall | L 77–81 | 32:13 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-10 | 0-1 | 5-9 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | James Madison | W 73–65 | 34:50 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 8-8 | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-29 | App State | L 63–70 | 35:26 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3-10 | 0-1 | 3-8 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Coastal Carolina | L 67–85 | 35:56 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-22 | Georgia St. | L 62–69 | 38:00 | 13 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-12 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Texas St. | L 67–74 | 35:07 | 16 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-9 | 1-3 | 5-7 | 61.1% |
| 2026-01-14 | Troy | L 65–91 | 31:10 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5-11 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 45.5% |
| 2026-01-10 · NCAA | ULM | W 70–60 | 34:54 | 15 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6-12 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | Texas St. | W 80–70 | 34:05 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-03 | Louisiana | W 74–67 | 40:00 | 15 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-01 · NCAA | ULM | W 87–73 | 38:30 | 14 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 5-8 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 68.8% |
| 2025-12-29 | LSU | L 62–90 | 21:45 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 16.7% |
| 2025-12-20 | Arkansas St. | L 86–93 | 23:17 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 5-9 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 55.6% |
| 2025-12-18 | Louisiana | W 62–54 | 27:11 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 5-8 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Ole Miss | L 67–71 | 36:24 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2-5 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-08 | Grambling | W 68–60 | 35:27 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Miami (FL) | L 64–88 | 23:49 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Radford | W 82–75 | 31:32 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 8-8 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | UT Martin | W 70–60 | 35:18 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-8 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 12.5% |
| 2025-11-22 | North Florida | W 92–83 | 30:58 | 13 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 85.7% |
| 2025-11-13 | Grambling | L 70–75 | 20:28 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 20.0% |
| 2025-11-09 | South Carolina | L 79–83 | 16:25 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Buffalo | L 79–85 | 17:40 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |