Djahi Binet
Southern Miss. · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
898:30 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 27:14
- Points per game
- 11.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 8.1 / 0.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.5 | 8.1 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 2.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.9 | 11.9 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 3.7 |
| Season totals | 380 | 267 | 29 | 22 | 37 | 47 | 82 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 145–234 | 62.0% | 7.1 | 10.4 |
| 2P | 141–222 | 63.5% | 6.7 | 9.9 |
| 3P | 4–12 | 33.3%† | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| FT | 86–122 | 70.5% | 3.7 | 5.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62.8% | 66.0% | 5.1% | 52.1% | 0.62 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Southern Miss · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $56K
- 80% range $19K to $170K
- Median share of team pool
- 19.7%
- team pool $260K, 80% range $97K to $690K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $50K to $58K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 68.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Southern Miss: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Southern Miss | $56Kspeculative | $19K to $170K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.1 | +1.2 to +3.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +2.0 | +5.9range +5.4 to +6.5 | 2,697 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Alcorn St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.8 | -1.8 to +0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -1.3 | +0.5 | +1.9range +1.6 to +2.3 | 2,008 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 27:52 | 27:14 | 14:10–38:07 | |
| Points | 11.4 | 11.5 | 0.0–31.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 58.4% | 59.6% | 0.0%–86.4% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | Troy | L 70–78 | 31:16 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 75.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | App State | W 86–73 | 16:08 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 57.1% |
| 2026-03-06 | Texas St. | W 81–77 | 31:11 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 57.1% |
| 2026-03-05 | James Madison | W 86–80 | 23:37 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4-10 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-27 | South Alabama | W 68–55 | 37:07 | 13 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-24 | Arkansas St. | L 84–89 | 22:34 | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8-11 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 72.7% |
| 2026-02-21 | Old Dominion | W 86–81 | 25:52 | 13 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 55.6% |
| 2026-02-14 | Troy | W 69–65 | 32:14 | 14 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 53.8% |
| 2026-02-12 | South Alabama | L 78–84 | 35:13 | 15 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 5-5 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-07 | Kent St. | W 66–65 | 36:20 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7-12 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-04 | Marshall | L 77–81 | 36:54 | 31 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9-11 | 1-1 | 12-12 | 86.4% |
| 2026-01-31 | James Madison | W 73–65 | 27:13 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | App State | L 63–70 | 28:06 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Coastal Carolina | L 67–85 | 30:03 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-9 | 0-1 | 6-10 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-22 | Georgia St. | L 62–69 | 25:07 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Texas St. | L 67–74 | 30:41 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Troy | L 65–91 | 25:10 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 71.4% |
| 2026-01-10 · NCAA | ULM | W 70–60 | 33:06 | 16 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6-9 | 1-2 | 3-6 | 72.2% |
| 2026-01-08 | Texas St. | W 80–70 | 38:07 | 12 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 85.7% |
| 2026-01-03 | Louisiana | W 74–67 | 35:11 | 24 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7-9 | 0-0 | 10-11 | 77.8% |
| 2026-01-01 · NCAA | ULM | W 87–73 | 25:18 | 14 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6-10 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | LSU | L 62–90 | 14:35 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Arkansas St. | L 86–93 | 21:59 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-18 | Louisiana | W 62–54 | 26:43 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 5-8 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Ole Miss | L 67–71 | 31:25 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-08 | Grambling | W 68–60 | 18:15 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | Miami (FL) | L 64–88 | 23:59 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 85.7% |
| 2025-12-03 | Radford | W 82–75 | 34:21 | 17 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 7-8 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-23 | UT Martin | W 70–60 | 26:45 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-22 | North Florida | W 92–83 | 24:56 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 2-5 | 71.4% |
| 2025-11-13 | Grambling | L 70–75 | 16:26 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-09 | South Carolina | L 79–83 | 14:10 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Buffalo | L 79–85 | 18:28 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 66.7% |