Luke Skaljac
Miami (OH) · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
824:30 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 28:26
- Points per game
- 10.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.8 / 4.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.5 | 2.8 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.8 | 3.9 | 6.5 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 2.2 |
| Season totals | 305 | 81 | 133 | 42 | 5 | 53 | 45 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 111–242 | 45.9% | 8.3 | 11.7 |
| 2P | 76–135 | 56.3% | 4.7 | 6.5 |
| 3P | 35–107 | 32.7% | 3.7 | 5.2 |
| FT | 48–62 | 77.4% | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.1% | 56.6% | 44.2% | 25.6% | 2.51 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Miami OH · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $43K
- 80% range $14K to $125K
- Median share of team pool
- 14.2%
- team pool $295K, 80% range $110K to $805K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $37K to $46K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 66.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Miami OH: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Miami OH | $43Kspeculative | $14K to $125K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.1 | +1.8 to +4.3 | Sufficient evidence | +2.9 | +0.2 | +5.2range +4.5 to +5.9 | 2,766 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Miami OH | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.3 | -1.1 to +1.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.1 | -0.9 | +1.5range +1.3 to +1.9 | 1,205 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 27:00 | 28:26 | 20:57–39:01 | |
| Points | 9.8 | 10.5 | 2.0–24.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 53.8% | 50.5% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-20 | Tennessee | L 56–78 | 24:57 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-18 | SMU | W 89–79 | 30:17 | 17 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-12 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 70.8% |
| 2026-03-12 | Massachusetts | L 83–87 | 26:32 | 10 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-9 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 55.6% |
| 2026-03-06 | Ohio | W 110–108 | 24:48 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2-7 | 0-4 | 3-4 | 28.6% |
| 2026-03-03 | Toledo | W 74–72 | 28:28 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4-7 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 64.3% |
| 2026-02-24 | Eastern Mich. | W 74–64 | 30:01 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-9 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 22.2% |
| 2026-02-20 | Bowling Green | W 91–77 | 34:21 | 24 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8-16 | 5-10 | 3-3 | 65.6% |
| 2026-02-17 | Massachusetts | W 86–77 | 30:33 | 16 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6-9 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 72.2% |
| 2026-02-13 | Ohio | W 90–74 | 31:15 | 12 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 5-11 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 54.5% |
| 2026-02-07 | Marshall | W 90–74 | 31:25 | 12 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 44.4% |
| 2026-02-03 | Buffalo | W 73–71 | 30:21 | 19 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9-15 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 63.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | NIU | W 85–61 | 28:44 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5-9 | 0-3 | 3-3 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-20 | Kent St. | W 107–101 | 38:01 | 18 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7-13 | 2-6 | 2-3 | 61.5% |
| 2026-01-17 | Buffalo | W 105–102 | 39:01 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6-12 | 1-5 | 5-5 | 54.2% |
| 2026-01-13 | Central Mich. | W 100–61 | 27:19 | 13 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 92.9% |
| 2026-01-09 | Toledo | W 87–73 | 27:12 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-06 | Western Mich. | W 87–76 | 34:23 | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-11 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Akron | W 76–73 | 31:42 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3-12 | 2-7 | 3-4 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-30 | Bowling Green | W 93–83 | 29:12 | 15 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6-9 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 72.2% |
| 2025-12-20 | Ball St. | W 86–77 | 23:30 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-16 | Wright St. | W 83–76 | 21:11 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-13 | Eastern Ky. | W 79–69 | 27:30 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-10 | UNC Asheville | W 90–87 | 32:50 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | Maine | W 93–61 | 22:50 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | UNC Greensboro | W 82–71 | 21:17 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-5 | 0-4 | 2-4 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 111–84 | 23:08 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-7 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-20 | Mercyhurst | W 76–71 | 20:57 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Air Force | W 76–61 | 23:16 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 71.4% |
| 2025-11-03 | Old Dominion | W 87–72 | 29:29 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2-9 | 1-4 | 5-6 | 27.8% |