Noah Otshudi
Marshall · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
969:56 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 32:20
- Points per game
- 14.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.3 / 3.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.5 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 2.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 17.9 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 2.8 |
| Season totals | 435 | 99 | 104 | 28 | 1 | 84 | 69 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 163–358 | 45.5% | 11.9 | 14.8 |
| 2P | 142–289 | 49.1% | 9.6 | 11.9 |
| 3P | 21–69 | 30.4% | 2.3 | 2.8 |
| FT | 88–104 | 84.6% | 3.5 | 4.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.5% | 53.9% | 19.3% | 29.1% | 1.24 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Marshall · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $13K
- 80% range $2K to $66K
- Median share of team pool
- 6.0%
- team pool $325K, 80% range $120K to $865K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $11K to $13K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $3K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 78.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Marshall: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Marshall | $13Kspeculative | $2K to $66K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.5 | -2.5 to -0.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | -1.9 | +4.6range +3.7 to +5.4 | 2,982 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:28 | 32:20 | 19:54–39:08 | |
| Points | 13.8 | 14.5 | 2.0–30.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 52.2% | 47.5% | 12.5%–77.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-27 | Ga. Southern | L 82–99 | 36:01 | 19 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7-13 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 53.8% |
| 2026-02-24 | Old Dominion | W 97–88 | 32:52 | 18 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7-12 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-21 | Coastal Carolina | L 75–79 | 33:36 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 9-17 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 52.9% |
| 2026-02-19 | App State | W 94–93 | 37:24 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-8 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-16 | South Alabama | W 84–80 | 32:28 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Ga. Southern | L 87–101 | 29:37 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 5-12 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-11 | Old Dominion | W 81–79 | 20:54 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7-12 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-07 | Miami (OH) | L 74–90 | 34:05 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11-19 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 57.9% |
| 2026-02-04 | Southern Miss. | W 81–77 | 36:38 | 17 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5-10 | 0-1 | 7-8 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Arkansas St. | W 70–61 | 31:04 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-12 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 41.7% |
| 2026-01-28 | Texas St. | L 68–72 | 35:57 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-13 | 0-3 | 3-3 | 46.2% |
| 2026-01-22 · NCAA | ULM | W 115–60 | 19:54 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2-10 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | James Madison | W 77–72 | 32:22 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-13 | 0-2 | 9-10 | 30.8% |
| 2026-01-14 | Coastal Carolina | L 83–85 | 33:00 | 30 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 12-23 | 2-2 | 4-4 | 56.5% |
| 2026-01-10 | Georgia St. | L 73–81 | 29:09 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4-11 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 40.9% |
| 2026-01-07 | James Madison | W 66–64 | 39:08 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-14 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | App State | W 88–81 | 36:23 | 17 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7-10 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | Georgia St. | W 84–80 | 23:43 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-20 | Troy | L 63–70 | 36:55 | 22 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8-19 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Wright St. | W 76–74 | 32:25 | 18 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 6-9 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 72.2% |
| 2025-12-10 | Western Ky. | W 77–61 | 36:01 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-16 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 31.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | Ohio | L 81–88 | 29:51 | 21 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 8-11 | 1-2 | 4-5 | 77.3% |
| 2025-12-03 | UNCW | L 69–70 | 37:10 | 18 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6-13 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 53.8% |
| 2025-11-26 | Lipscomb | L 67–90 | 36:21 | 18 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-13 | 2-4 | 6-6 | 46.2% |
| 2025-11-23 | Mercyhurst | W 69–60 | 24:10 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 12.5% |
| 2025-11-20 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 98–70 | 32:14 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-9 | 0-3 | 3-4 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-15 · NCAA | Virginia | L 78–104 | 32:18 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4-12 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-12 | Elon | W 96–89 | 37:58 | 14 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 5-8 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Toledo | W 85–73 | 28:04 | 13 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5-10 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 55.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Massachusetts | W 78–72 | 32:14 | 10 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 3-9 | 1-5 | 3-3 | 38.9% |