John Hugley IV
Duquesne · 2025–26 · 26 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
415:40 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 26
- Minutes per game
- 15:59
- Points per game
- 7.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.4 / 1.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.5 | 3.4 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.9 | 8.6 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 3.6 | 4.9 |
| Season totals | 196 | 89 | 34 | 6 | 4 | 37 | 51 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 65–132 | 49.2% | 5.1 | 12.7 |
| 2P | 57–100 | 57.0% | 3.8 | 9.6 |
| 3P | 8–32 | 25.0%† | 1.2 | 3.1 |
| FT | 58–79 | 73.4% | 3.0 | 7.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.3% | 58.8% | 24.2% | 59.8% | 0.92 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Duquesne · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $20K
- 80% range $4K to $63K
- Median share of team pool
- 3.7%
- team pool $705K, 80% range $325K to $1.55M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $19K to $24K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $4K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 32.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Duquesne: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Duquesne | $20Kspeculative | $4K to $63K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.6 | -1.7 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | -0.7 | +1.9range +1.6 to +2.2 | 1,355 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Xavier | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.3 | -0.8 to +1.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.9 | -0.6 | +1.3range +1.1 to +1.6 | 1,052 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Oklahoma | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.4 | +2.4 to +4.3 | Sufficient evidence | +2.1 | +1.3 | +1.9range +1.7 to +2.2 | 1,374 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Pittsburgh | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.1 | -1.0 to +0.7 | Limited evidence | -0.5 | +0.4 | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.5 | 326 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2022 | Pittsburgh | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.7 | -0.8 to +2.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +0.6 | Not computed for this season | 2,580 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 7:33 | 15:59 | 3:06–35:34 | |
| Points | 2.0 | 7.5 | 0.0–27.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 36.7% | 44.5% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | VCU | L 66–71 | 3:06 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-12 | Rhode Island | W 67–61 | 8:13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Richmond | W 79–77 | 4:47 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-04 | Rhode Island | L 52–64 | 10:03 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | Saint Louis | L 76–91 | 11:37 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | Davidson | L 56–67 | 7:01 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Dayton | L 66–78 | 13:00 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | — |
| 2026-02-18 | La Salle | W 62–61 | 11:48 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | St. Bonaventure | W 78–73 | 7:04 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | George Washington | W 88–86 | 6:15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-2 | — |
| 2026-02-04 | George Mason | W 71–65 | 5:41 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-01 | Rhode Island | W 76–61 | 18:36 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | St. Bonaventure | L 79–87 | 19:34 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 6-8 | 28.6% |
| 2026-01-24 | Loyola Chicago | W 71–59 | 12:47 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-20 | Saint Louis | L 77–81 | 12:20 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 3-4 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | Fordham | W 74–63 | 16:36 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 4-8 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-13 | Dayton | L 65–71 | 9:21 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-10 | Boise St. | L 64–86 | 21:05 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-7 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 71.4% |
| 2025-12-06 | Stony Brook | W 84–75 | 23:05 | 25 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-15 | 2-5 | 7-8 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | William & Mary | L 79–83 | 17:35 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-22 | Northeastern | L 86–93 | 29:09 | 18 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 6-13 | 0-2 | 6-9 | 46.2% |
| 2025-11-19 | Loyola Maryland | W 92–78 | 28:43 | 20 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7-8 | 1-1 | 5-7 | 93.8% |
| 2025-11-15 | Villanova | L 77–87 | 23:42 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2-6 | 2-5 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Queens (NC) | W 87–81 | 35:34 | 27 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 9-12 | 0-2 | 9-11 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | Sacred Heart | W 92–80 | 33:36 | 25 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 9-17 | 0-3 | 7-7 | 52.9% |
| 2025-11-03 | Niagara | W 83–63 | 25:22 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 58.3% |