Legend Smiley
San Francisco · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
663:16 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 21:24
- Points per game
- 8.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.9 / 0.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 8.0 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.0 | 3.5 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 3.6 |
| Season totals | 248 | 58 | 19 | 15 | 4 | 24 | 60 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 81–181 | 44.8% | 5.8 | 10.9 |
| 2P | 29–57 | 50.9%† | 1.8 | 3.4 |
| 3P | 52–124 | 41.9% | 4.0 | 7.5 |
| FT | 34–39 | 87.2% | 1.3 | 2.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59.1% | 62.6% | 68.5% | 21.5% | 0.79 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
San Francisco · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $42K
- 80% range $6K to $120K
- Median share of team pool
- 7.5%
- team pool $680K, 80% range $305K to $1.55M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $39K to $52K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $5K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 52.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
San Francisco: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | San Francisco | $42Kspeculative | $6K to $120K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.0 | -1.7 to +1.5 | Sufficient evidence | +1.1 | -1.1 | +3.2range +2.6 to +3.8 | 1,959 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 28:58 | 21:24 | 6:33–35:05 | |
| Points | 10.0 | 8.0 | 0.0–18.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 71.7% | 54.9% | 0.0%–150.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | Oregon St. | L 77–78 | 31:22 | 18 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6-8 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 112.5% |
| 2026-03-07 | Portland | W 82–65 | 32:42 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Pacific | W 72–61 | 27:08 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-6 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Santa Clara | L 73–94 | 28:09 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-18 | Gonzaga | L 59–80 | 25:27 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2026-02-15 | San Diego | W 92–79 | 30:17 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-7 | 3-6 | 6-7 | 64.3% |
| 2026-02-12 | Oregon St. | L 63–90 | 31:22 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-8 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 87.5% |
| 2026-02-07 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 54–79 | 18:23 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | LMU (CA) | L 75–84 | 35:05 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-9 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 44.4% |
| 2026-01-31 | Pacific | W 87–82 | 28:38 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4-9 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-28 | Santa Clara | L 73–88 | 17:10 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-24 | Gonzaga | L 66–68 | 33:01 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-8 | 5-6 | 3-3 | 93.8% |
| 2026-01-18 | Washington St. | W 85–80 | 17:23 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-13 | Saint Mary's (CA) | L 68–82 | 26:17 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-10 | Pepperdine | W 80–60 | 23:00 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1-8 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 18.8% |
| 2026-01-08 | LMU (CA) | L 82–84 | 29:03 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5-10 | 3-5 | 3-3 | 65.0% |
| 2026-01-04 | Portland | W 73–68 | 23:26 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-8 | 1-6 | 3-3 | 31.3% |
| 2026-01-02 | San Diego | W 74–64 | 18:21 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-11 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 68.2% |
| 2025-12-30 | Oregon St. | L 62–70 | 10:35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-28 | Seattle U | W 67–59 | 9:55 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 3-4 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | Morgan St. | W 94–64 | 22:54 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 8-8 | 87.5% |
| 2025-12-17 | Loyola Chicago | W 85–71 | 15:50 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Saint Louis | L 75–85 | 18:46 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-11 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 59.1% |
| 2025-12-07 | Mississippi St. | W 65–62 | 13:58 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | North Ala. | L 63–65 | 14:43 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-6 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 91.7% |
| 2025-11-27 | Colorado | L 69–79 | 12:31 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-22 | Minnesota | W 77–65 | 8:28 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | Northwestern St. | W 84–64 | 23:17 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-7 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 78.6% |
| 2025-11-15 | Bradley | W 75–64 | 6:33 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 150.0% |
| 2025-11-12 | Portland St. | W 80–70 | 16:40 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Memphis | L 70–76 | 12:52 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 33.3% |