Ja'Kobi Gillespie
Tennessee · 2025–26 · 37 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1284:50 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 37
- Minutes per game
- 34:44
- Points per game
- 18.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.8 / 5.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 18.4 | 2.8 | 5.4 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 21.2 | 3.3 | 6.3 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 2.6 |
| Season totals | 681 | 105 | 201 | 79 | 8 | 85 | 84 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 232–566 | 41.0% | 15.3 | 17.6 |
| 2P | 129–261 | 49.4% | 7.1 | 8.1 |
| 3P | 103–305 | 33.8% | 8.2 | 9.5 |
| FT | 114–140 | 81.4% | 3.8 | 4.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.1% | 54.3% | 53.9% | 24.7% | 2.36 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Tennessee · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $990K
- 80% range $635K to $1.70M
- Median share of team pool
- 26.6%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $990K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $22K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 86.3%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Tennessee: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Tennessee | $990Kspeculative | $635K to $1.70M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +6.6 | +5.2 to +8.0 | Sufficient evidence | +5.1 | +1.5 | +10.0range +9.1 to +10.9 | 4,351 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Maryland | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +5.6 | +4.3 to +6.8 | Sufficient evidence | +4.0 | +1.6 | +6.7range +5.8 to +7.3 | 3,847 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Belmont | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +4.0 | +2.4 to +5.6 | Sufficient evidence | +2.5 | +1.5 | +4.3range +3.6 to +5.2 | 2,592 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Belmont | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.2 | -0.9 to +1.3 | Sufficient evidence | +1.1 | -0.9 | +2.7range +2.1 to +3.2 | 1,882 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 37:13 | 34:44 | 24:27–48:34 | |
| Points | 21.6 | 18.4 | 8.0–34.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 56.1% | 50.9% | 25.0%–80.6% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-29 | Michigan | L 62–95 | 37:44 | 21 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8-22 | 4-13 | 1-1 | 45.5% |
| 2026-03-27 | Iowa St. | W 76–62 | 35:40 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 7-17 | 2-11 | 0-0 | 47.1% |
| 2026-03-22 | Virginia | W 79–72 | 37:52 | 21 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6-14 | 3-5 | 6-6 | 53.6% |
| 2026-03-20 | Miami (OH) | W 78–56 | 36:35 | 29 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11-21 | 6-11 | 1-1 | 66.7% |
| 2026-03-13 | Vanderbilt | L 68–75 | 38:13 | 21 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8-14 | 3-7 | 2-4 | 67.9% |
| 2026-03-12 | Auburn | W 72–62 | 35:44 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-11 | 0-2 | 5-7 | 45.5% |
| 2026-03-07 | Vanderbilt | L 82–86 | 36:54 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 5-22 | 1-11 | 6-7 | 25.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | South Carolina | W 78–59 | 34:35 | 8 | 2 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-9 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | Alabama | L 69–71 | 36:26 | 26 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-23 | 3-10 | 5-6 | 45.7% |
| 2026-02-24 | Missouri | L 69–73 | 36:06 | 19 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8-21 | 3-12 | 0-0 | 45.2% |
| 2026-02-21 | Vanderbilt | W 69–65 | 35:34 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-14 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 53.6% |
| 2026-02-18 | Oklahoma | W 89–66 | 36:00 | 16 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6-16 | 2-9 | 2-2 | 43.8% |
| 2026-02-14 | LSU | W 73–63 | 35:08 | 12 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-9 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-11 | Mississippi St. | W 73–64 | 37:14 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7-19 | 2-8 | 2-3 | 42.1% |
| 2026-02-07 | Kentucky | L 71–74 | 37:08 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-15 | 4-11 | 1-2 | 46.7% |
| 2026-02-03 | Ole Miss | W 84–66 | 34:22 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-13 | 5-10 | 5-8 | 57.7% |
| 2026-01-31 | Auburn | W 77–69 | 28:26 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-7 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | Georgia | W 86–85 | 40:33 | 21 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7-19 | 4-11 | 3-4 | 47.4% |
| 2026-01-24 | Alabama | W 79–73 | 37:19 | 24 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8-20 | 2-9 | 6-8 | 45.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Kentucky | L 78–80 | 32:28 | 24 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 6-12 | 4-7 | 8-12 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-13 | Texas A&M | W 87–82 | 48:34 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 5-19 | 2-11 | 6-8 | 31.6% |
| 2026-01-10 | Florida | L 67–91 | 37:36 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3-10 | 2-6 | 4-5 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-06 | Texas | W 85–71 | 37:11 | 34 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 12-18 | 5-8 | 5-5 | 80.6% |
| 2026-01-03 | Arkansas | L 75–86 | 33:37 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-15 | 2-7 | 2-2 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-30 | South Carolina St. | W 105–54 | 28:29 | 21 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-12 | 3-8 | 4-4 | 70.8% |
| 2025-12-21 | Gardner-Webb | W 94–52 | 24:27 | 15 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6-12 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-16 | Louisville | W 83–62 | 33:33 | 23 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-12 | 3-7 | 10-10 | 54.2% |
| 2025-12-06 | Illinois | L 62–75 | 34:43 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6-20 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-02 | Syracuse | L 60–62 | 32:04 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5-12 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-26 | Kansas | L 76–81 | 36:06 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-19 | 1-10 | 0-0 | 28.9% |
| 2025-11-25 | Houston | W 76–73 | 38:12 | 22 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5-16 | 3-9 | 9-9 | 40.6% |
| 2025-11-24 | Rutgers | W 85–60 | 28:45 | 32 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 11-20 | 6-10 | 4-5 | 70.0% |
| 2025-11-20 | Tennessee St. | W 89–60 | 30:51 | 17 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 7-13 | 1-7 | 2-2 | 57.7% |
| 2025-11-17 | Rice | W 91–66 | 33:30 | 17 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 6-12 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-12 | North Florida | W 99–66 | 31:28 | 21 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 6-13 | 4-10 | 5-6 | 61.5% |
| 2025-11-08 | Northern Ky. | W 95–56 | 27:02 | 20 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8-14 | 4-10 | 0-1 | 71.4% |
| 2025-11-03 | Mercer | W 76–61 | 28:41 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3-11 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 36.4% |