Otega Oweh
Kentucky · 2025–26 · 36 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1175:47 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 36
- Minutes per game
- 32:40
- Points per game
- 18.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.8 / 2.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 18.6 | 4.8 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 22.8 | 5.9 | 3.3 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 3.3 |
| Season totals | 671 | 173 | 96 | 64 | 9 | 74 | 96 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 234–503 | 46.5% | 14.0 | 17.1 |
| 2P | 189–368 | 51.4% | 10.2 | 12.5 |
| 3P | 45–135 | 33.3% | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| FT | 158–216 | 73.1% | 6.0 | 7.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.0% | 56.1% | 26.8% | 42.9% | 1.30 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Kentucky · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $545K
- 80% range $320K to $830K
- Median share of team pool
- 15.7%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.55M to $5.00M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $545K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $25K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 81.8%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Kentucky: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Kentucky | $545Kspeculative | $320K to $830K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.1 | +1.7 to +4.1 | Sufficient evidence | +2.4 | +0.6 | +7.0range +6.2 to +7.7 | 4,118 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Kentucky | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.1 | +1.4 to +4.3 | Sufficient evidence | +2.3 | +0.7 | +5.2range +4.4 to +6.0 | 3,574 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Oklahoma | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.0 | +0.3 to +3.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | +1.3 | +3.1range +2.5 to +3.9 | 2,674 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Oklahoma | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.2 | -1.2 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | -1.2 | +1.1 | +1.4range +1.1 to +1.7 | 1,252 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 38:03 | 32:40 | 18:46–42:40 | |
| Points | 21.4 | 18.6 | 8.0–35.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 46.8% | 51.3% | 23.1%–87.5% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-22 | Iowa St. | L 63–82 | 35:55 | 18 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 8-15 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 56.7% |
| 2026-03-20 | Santa Clara | W 89–84 | 42:40 | 35 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 11-24 | 3-8 | 10-12 | 52.1% |
| 2026-03-13 | Florida | L 63–71 | 38:09 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 5-18 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 27.8% |
| 2026-03-12 | Missouri | W 78–72 | 35:00 | 21 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 9-18 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 55.6% |
| 2026-03-11 | LSU | W 87–82 | 38:32 | 23 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-19 | 0-3 | 7-10 | 42.1% |
| 2026-03-07 | Florida | L 77–84 | 38:28 | 28 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8-21 | 4-8 | 8-8 | 47.6% |
| 2026-03-03 | Texas A&M | L 85–96 | 36:55 | 24 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6-15 | 3-5 | 9-12 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Vanderbilt | W 91–77 | 33:34 | 23 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9-16 | 0-3 | 5-6 | 56.3% |
| 2026-02-24 | South Carolina | W 72–63 | 36:49 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-13 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 23.1% |
| 2026-02-21 | Auburn | L 74–75 | 35:07 | 29 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11-20 | 1-3 | 6-8 | 57.5% |
| 2026-02-17 | Georgia | L 78–86 | 34:29 | 28 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 11-18 | 3-5 | 3-6 | 69.4% |
| 2026-02-14 | Florida | L 83–92 | 36:44 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4-14 | 0-3 | 5-7 | 28.6% |
| 2026-02-07 | Tennessee | W 74–71 | 35:51 | 21 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 10-17 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 58.8% |
| 2026-02-04 | Oklahoma | W 94–78 | 35:15 | 24 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-11 | 3-4 | 7-9 | 77.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | Arkansas | W 85–77 | 37:10 | 24 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9-12 | 0-1 | 6-11 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-27 | Vanderbilt | L 55–80 | 31:13 | 20 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7-19 | 2-6 | 4-6 | 42.1% |
| 2026-01-24 | Ole Miss | W 72–63 | 29:10 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-12 | 1-5 | 10-13 | 54.2% |
| 2026-01-21 | Texas | W 85–80 | 36:32 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8-20 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Tennessee | W 80–78 | 30:01 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3-11 | 1-5 | 5-9 | 31.8% |
| 2026-01-14 | LSU | W 75–74 | 36:28 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-13 | 3-6 | 6-10 | 57.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | Mississippi St. | W 92–68 | 32:34 | 22 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 10-17 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 64.7% |
| 2026-01-07 | Missouri | L 68–73 | 35:23 | 20 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-11 | 3-4 | 5-8 | 68.2% |
| 2026-01-03 | Alabama | L 74–89 | 35:31 | 22 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8-16 | 1-4 | 5-7 | 53.1% |
| 2025-12-23 | Bellarmine | W 99–85 | 32:29 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 6-8 | 28.6% |
| 2025-12-20 | St. John's (NY) | W 78–66 | 33:55 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6-17 | 0-3 | 8-9 | 35.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | Indiana | W 72–60 | 33:08 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-2 | 5-8 | 31.3% |
| 2025-12-09 | N.C. Central | W 103–67 | 27:18 | 21 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9-12 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 87.5% |
| 2025-12-05 | Gonzaga | L 59–94 | 28:53 | 16 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 9-10 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | North Carolina | L 64–67 | 32:02 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6-11 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 54.5% |
| 2025-11-26 | Tennessee Tech | W 104–54 | 24:19 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-11 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 59.1% |
| 2025-11-21 | Loyola Maryland | W 88–46 | 24:46 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 61.1% |
| 2025-11-18 | Michigan St. | L 66–83 | 31:19 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4-12 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-14 | Eastern Ill. | W 99–53 | 18:46 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-11 | Louisville | L 88–96 | 27:49 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 4-13 | 1-6 | 3-4 | 34.6% |
| 2025-11-07 | Valparaiso | W 107–59 | 22:04 | 15 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6-10 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 65.0% |
| 2025-11-04 | Nicholls | W 77–51 | 21:29 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 4-5 | 50.0% |