Giovanni Emejuru
East Carolina · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
975:08 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 32:30
- Points per game
- 12.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 9.2 / 0.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.5 | 9.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.4 | 11.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 3.2 |
| Season totals | 376 | 276 | 16 | 25 | 51 | 54 | 77 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 128–219 | 58.4% | 7.3 | 9.0 |
| 2P | 128–218 | 58.7% | 7.3 | 8.9 |
| 3P | 0–1 | 0.0%† | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| FT | 120–196 | 61.2% | 6.5 | 8.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58.4% | 61.6% | 0.5% | 89.5% | 0.30 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
East Carolina · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $88K
- 80% range $6K to $285K
- Median share of team pool
- 13.4%
- team pool $910K, 80% range $395K to $2.05M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $70K to $99K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $7K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 81.6%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
East Carolina: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | East Carolina | $88Kspeculative | $6K to $285K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.0 | -2.1 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.9 | -0.1 | +3.7range +3.2 to +4.3 | 3,202 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | George Mason | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.9 | -0.2 to +1.9 | Sufficient evidence | -0.4 | +1.2 | +2.0range +1.7 to +2.4 | 1,757 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Siena | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.8 | +0.1 to +1.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | +0.0 | +1.6range +1.4 to +1.8 | 673 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 32:13 | 32:30 | 19:54–47:57 | |
| Points | 9.4 | 12.5 | 4.0–21.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 59.4% | 60.0% | 25.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | UAB | L 83–90 | 35:20 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 55.6% |
| 2026-03-05 | Tulsa | L 66–93 | 26:15 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 3-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-01 | Memphis | W 84–68 | 27:04 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | UTSA | W 82–81 | 34:54 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 80.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Charlotte | L 56–68 | 37:33 | 10 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-5 | 71.4% |
| 2026-02-18 | Wichita St. | L 89–92 | 47:57 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 6-12 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-14 | Rice | W 85–75 | 36:25 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 7-12 | 83.3% |
| 2026-02-11 | UTSA | W 88–72 | 29:32 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-07 | Temple | L 73–81 | 33:46 | 10 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 6-10 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-01 | Fla. Atlantic | W 76–75 | 34:55 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-28 | Rice | L 77–83 | 36:07 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 9-10 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-23 | North Texas | W 63–59 | 39:01 | 10 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Wichita St. | L 60–77 | 29:30 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4-11 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 36.4% |
| 2026-01-18 | Charlotte | L 70–73 | 36:41 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-14 | South Fla. | L 71–82 | 32:52 | 17 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 5-12 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-11 | UAB | L 85–87 | 31:01 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 6-9 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-07 | Temple | L 67–75 | 30:03 | 19 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 7-11 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-31 | Tulane | L 70–79 | 25:55 | 12 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 6-9 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | North Carolina | L 51–99 | 33:40 | 21 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8-11 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 72.7% |
| 2025-12-17 | Presbyterian | W 74–53 | 38:34 | 21 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9-11 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 81.8% |
| 2025-12-14 | Buffalo | W 73–70 | 28:06 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-11 | App State | L 54–67 | 30:01 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-06 | UNC Greensboro | L 78–82 | 36:15 | 15 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 87.5% |
| 2025-12-02 | UMES | W 68–56 | 27:49 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-27 | St. Bonaventure | L 58–67 | 37:23 | 6 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | Michigan St. | L 56–89 | 33:59 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Charleston So. | L 65–77 | 36:13 | 18 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5-11 | 0-0 | 8-12 | 45.5% |
| 2025-11-18 | UNCW | L 60–85 | 19:54 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Richmond | L 72–87 | 24:28 | 20 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 10-14 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-04 | Ga. Southern | W 92–89 | 23:55 | 17 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 7-11 | 62.5% |