Tommy Kamarad
Winthrop · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
548:15 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 18:17
- Points per game
- 6.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.4 / 0.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.4 | 3.4 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.0 | 7.4 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 4.7 |
| Season totals | 192 | 101 | 28 | 24 | 8 | 28 | 65 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 68–151 | 45.0% | 5.0 | 11.0 |
| 2P | 49–87 | 56.3%† | 2.9 | 6.3 |
| 3P | 19–64 | 29.7% | 2.1 | 4.7 |
| FT | 37–46 | 80.4% | 1.5 | 3.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.3% | 56.1% | 42.4% | 30.5% | 1.00 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Winthrop · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $13K
- 80% range $3K to $40K
- Median share of team pool
- 8.1%
- team pool $180K, 80% range $67K to $500K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $12K to $15K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 44.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Winthrop: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Winthrop | $13Kspeculative | $3K to $40K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.1 | +0.0 to +2.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | +0.9 | +3.0range +2.6 to +3.4 | 1,932 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Winthrop | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.3 | +0.1 to +2.6 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | +1.7 | +1.8range +1.5 to +2.1 | 1,427 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 16:29 | 18:17 | 4:34–28:52 | |
| Points | 3.0 | 6.4 | 0.0–19.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 52.1% | 50.5% | 0.0%–125.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | High Point | L 76–91 | 15:01 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Presbyterian | W 73–71 | 9:56 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 100.0% |
| 2026-03-06 | Charleston So. | W 86–81 | 22:04 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-7 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 35.7% |
| 2026-02-28 | Presbyterian | W 74–70 | 22:16 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | Charleston So. | L 84–86 | 13:06 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | High Point | L 87–89 | 21:16 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 42.9% |
| 2026-02-19 | USC Upstate | W 68–64 | 19:22 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | Gardner-Webb | W 103–85 | 20:01 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | Longwood | W 79–74 | 27:04 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-10 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 55.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Radford | W 80–78 | 13:37 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | UNC Asheville | W 84–71 | 28:52 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Presbyterian | W 82–72 | 20:54 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Radford | W 76–75 | 18:21 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-17 | UNC Asheville | W 69–67 | 22:02 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | High Point | W 92–75 | 23:12 | 17 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5-6 | 2-3 | 5-6 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | USC Upstate | W 71–50 | 17:40 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Charleston So. | W 81–77 | 24:36 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2025-12-31 | Longwood | L 70–82 | 23:31 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-28 | Texas Tech | L 57–87 | 25:41 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1-6 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 16.7% |
| 2025-12-18 | North Dakota | L 88–90 | 13:20 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 4-4 | 125.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Coastal Carolina | L 84–88 | 15:18 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | LIU | W 94–92 | 20:19 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 80.0% |
| 2025-11-29 | South Carolina St. | W 101–79 | 21:57 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7-9 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 88.9% |
| 2025-11-25 | Nebraska | L 73–80 | 18:52 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-23 | Jackson St. | W 80–62 | 15:03 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-18 | Arkansas | L 83–84 | 8:49 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Mercer | W 105–69 | 18:11 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-11 | Coastal Carolina | L 66–72 | 4:34 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | George Mason | L 90–96 | 13:19 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-03 | Queens (NC) | W 81–74 | 10:01 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 100.0% |