Kody Clouet
Winthrop · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
927:46 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 29:56
- Points per game
- 14.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.9 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.2 | 4.9 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.9 | 6.6 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 2.5 |
| Season totals | 439 | 153 | 45 | 26 | 7 | 27 | 57 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 131–292 | 44.9% | 9.4 | 12.6 |
| 2P | 46–83 | 55.4%† | 2.7 | 3.6 |
| 3P | 85–209 | 40.7% | 6.7 | 9.0 |
| FT | 92–109 | 84.4% | 3.5 | 4.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59.4% | 64.6% | 71.6% | 37.3% | 1.67 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Winthrop · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $44K
- 80% range $14K to $140K
- Median share of team pool
- 22.2%
- team pool $180K, 80% range $67K to $500K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $42K to $52K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 75.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Winthrop: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Winthrop | $44Kspeculative | $14K to $140K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.5 | +1.8 to +5.2 | Sufficient evidence | +2.5 | +0.9 | +6.3range +5.5 to +7.1 | 3,254 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | San Diego | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.5 | -2.4 to -0.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -1.6 | +1.6range +1.2 to +2.0 | 1,954 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:16 | 29:56 | 17:18–37:27 | |
| Points | 17.0 | 14.2 | 2.0–21.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 49.5% | 57.8% | 0.0%–112.5% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | High Point | L 76–91 | 35:50 | 12 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-14 | 3-13 | 3-4 | 32.1% |
| 2026-03-07 | Presbyterian | W 73–71 | 35:25 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4-10 | 1-5 | 8-8 | 45.0% |
| 2026-03-06 | Charleston So. | W 86–81 | 33:16 | 19 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-9 | 2-4 | 9-9 | 55.6% |
| 2026-02-28 | Presbyterian | W 74–70 | 32:34 | 19 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-10 | 3-9 | 8-10 | 55.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | Charleston So. | L 84–86 | 34:13 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-15 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | High Point | L 87–89 | 33:44 | 20 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-13 | 4-8 | 2-2 | 69.2% |
| 2026-02-19 | USC Upstate | W 68–64 | 34:39 | 17 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5-13 | 4-10 | 3-4 | 53.8% |
| 2026-02-12 | Gardner-Webb | W 103–85 | 32:15 | 19 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-11 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 86.4% |
| 2026-02-07 | Longwood | W 79–74 | 31:45 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 5-6 | 112.5% |
| 2026-02-04 | Radford | W 80–78 | 36:14 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6-12 | 3-8 | 2-2 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | UNC Asheville | W 84–71 | 29:54 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-8 | 4-6 | 3-3 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Presbyterian | W 82–72 | 34:04 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 4-5 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-21 | Radford | W 76–75 | 37:27 | 19 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-14 | 4-8 | 1-1 | 64.3% |
| 2026-01-17 | UNC Asheville | W 69–67 | 34:06 | 21 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-11 | 5-8 | 2-2 | 86.4% |
| 2026-01-14 | High Point | W 92–75 | 32:10 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-12 | 4-9 | 0-2 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | USC Upstate | W 71–50 | 27:24 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-9 | 2-7 | 2-2 | 44.4% |
| 2026-01-07 | Charleston So. | W 81–77 | 36:13 | 12 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2-11 | 1-6 | 7-7 | 22.7% |
| 2026-01-03 | Gardner-Webb | W 88–77 | 29:32 | 19 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5-9 | 3-6 | 6-6 | 72.2% |
| 2025-12-31 | Longwood | L 70–82 | 21:55 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-28 | Texas Tech | L 57–87 | 21:25 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-18 | North Dakota | L 88–90 | 30:32 | 21 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-9 | 4-7 | 7-10 | 77.8% |
| 2025-12-06 | Coastal Carolina | L 84–88 | 31:53 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-10 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 80.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | LIU | W 94–92 | 33:36 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2-6 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-29 | South Carolina St. | W 101–79 | 24:26 | 21 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8-13 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 80.8% |
| 2025-11-25 | Nebraska | L 73–80 | 20:43 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-6 | 1-6 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | Jackson St. | W 80–62 | 23:35 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3-9 | 1-6 | 2-2 | 38.9% |
| 2025-11-18 | Arkansas | L 83–84 | 24:18 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6-9 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 88.9% |
| 2025-11-15 | Mercer | W 105–69 | 17:18 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-7 | 3-5 | 3-6 | 78.6% |
| 2025-11-11 | Coastal Carolina | L 66–72 | 21:23 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | George Mason | L 90–96 | 26:11 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-9 | 3-9 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Queens (NC) | W 81–74 | 29:46 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-9 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 50.0% |