Jaquan Scott
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1004:57 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 46
- Minutes per game
- 21:51
- Points per game
- 11.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.3 / 0.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.0 | 5.3 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 3.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 20.1 | 9.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 3.5 | 5.7 |
| Season totals | 505 | 243 | 39 | 37 | 21 | 88 | 142 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 167–367 | 45.5% | 8.0 | 14.6 |
| 2P | 149–315 | 47.3% | 6.8 | 12.5 |
| 3P | 18–52 | 34.6% | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| FT | 153–185 | 82.7% | 4.0 | 7.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.0% | 56.3% | 14.2% | 50.4% | 0.44 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Jaquan Scott | Mississippi St | 11Under 100 minutes | 5:46 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 8.2 | 0.0%† | 20.0%† | 37.8%† |
| 2025 Jaquan Scott | UT San Antonio | 5Few games | 16:35 | 5.6 | 4.4 | 0.4 | 13.5 | 57.1%† | 72.7%† | 45.4%† |
| 2026 Jaquan Scott | Ark.-Pine Bluff | 30 | 28:37 | 15.5 | 6.8 | 1.1 | 21.6 | 31.8%† | 85.2% | 57.9% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Ark Pine Bluff · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $24K
- 80% range $4K to $90K
- Median share of team pool
- 15.9%
- team pool $140K, 80% range $51K to $380K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $22K to $25K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 70.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Ark Pine Bluff: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Ark Pine Bluff | $24Kspeculative | $4K to $90K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.1 | -1.0 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -0.3 | +3.4range +3.0 to +3.8 | 2,814 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2024 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology