Chris Loofe
Middle Tenn. · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
737:23 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 25:26
- Points per game
- 7.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.2 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.1 | 6.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 3.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.2 | 9.7 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 2.9 | 5.5 |
| Season totals | 206 | 179 | 21 | 6 | 31 | 53 | 102 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 73–144 | 50.7% | 5.0 | 7.8 |
| 2P | 65–109 | 59.6% | 3.8 | 5.9 |
| 3P | 8–35 | 22.9%† | 1.2 | 1.9 |
| FT | 52–82 | 63.4% | 2.8 | 4.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.5% | 57.2% | 24.3% | 56.9% | 0.40 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
MTSU · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $21K
- 80% range $3K to $69K
- Median share of team pool
- 9.3%
- team pool $300K, 80% range $110K to $770K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $19K to $21K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $3K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 62.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
MTSU: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | MTSU | $21Kspeculative | $3K to $69K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.0 | -1.2 to +0.8 | Sufficient evidence | -1.2 | +1.1 | +4.0range +3.4 to +4.4 | 2,470 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | MTSU | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.2 | -1.1 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.8 | +0.9 | +1.7range +1.5 to +2.1 | 1,327 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | MTSU | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.0 | -2.0 to -0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -1.3 | +0.3 | +0.7range +0.5 to +0.9 | 860 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 27:21 | 25:26 | 14:50–38:37 | |
| Points | 7.0 | 7.1 | 0.0–16.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 41.7% | 53.6% | 0.0%–108.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-12 | Louisiana Tech | L 69–80 | 23:09 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 6-7 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-07 | Missouri St. | W 75–63 | 19:29 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-05 | FIU | W 73–67 | 28:22 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | New Mexico St. | W 86–85 | 37:28 | 10 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 6-8 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-26 | UTEP | W 77–67 | 28:15 | 7 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Delaware | W 78–66 | 33:57 | 11 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Sam Houston | L 70–78 | 25:00 | 15 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Western Ky. | L 80–82 | 17:30 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-12 | Kennesaw St. | W 90–87 | 28:14 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Delaware | L 88–89 | 32:17 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | FIU | L 84–88 | 31:50 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4-5 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 90.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Western Ky. | L 60–65 | 31:51 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-8 | 0-3 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | Liberty | L 65–81 | 16:21 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-23 | Jacksonville St. | L 58–75 | 14:53 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Missouri St. | W 90–87 | 38:37 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-14 | Louisiana Tech | L 58–59 | 22:07 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 2-6 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-10 | New Mexico St. | W 59–55 | 34:27 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 4-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | UTEP | L 80–83 | 26:33 | 16 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6-6 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 108.3% |
| 2026-01-04 | Sam Houston | W 68–67 | 28:52 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2-9 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 22.2% |
| 2026-01-02 | Louisiana Tech | W 88–51 | 18:18 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | Houston | L 60–69 | 32:22 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 4-6 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 83.3% |
| 2025-12-17 | Kennesaw St. | W 68–67 | 21:57 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-07 | Belmont | L 62–83 | 25:50 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 87.5% |
| 2025-12-01 | UAB | W 76–61 | 17:10 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | McNeese | L 62–72 | 16:53 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | George Washington | L 79–92 | 24:47 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 71.4% |
| 2025-11-23 | Murray St. | W 90–87 | 14:50 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-19 | Michigan | L 61–86 | 20:32 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-12 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 20.8% |
| 2025-11-12 | Evansville | W 77–72 | 25:32 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |