Sebastian Robinson
NJIT · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
797:16 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 27:30
- Points per game
- 14.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.8 / 2.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.6 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 21.2 | 4.1 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 2.9 | 3.0 |
| Season totals | 422 | 81 | 62 | 35 | 4 | 58 | 59 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 158–355 | 44.5% | 12.2 | 17.8 |
| 2P | 146–306 | 47.7% | 10.6 | 15.4 |
| 3P | 12–49 | 24.5%† | 1.7 | 2.5 |
| FT | 94–133 | 70.7% | 4.6 | 6.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.2% | 51.0% | 13.8% | 37.5% | 1.07 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
NJIT · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $12K
- 80% range $1K to $51K
- Median share of team pool
- 8.9%
- team pool $215K, 80% range $79K to $595K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $12K to $14K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 59.1%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
NJIT: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | NJIT | $12Kspeculative | $1K to $51K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.2 | -2.1 to +0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.8 | -0.4 | +2.9range +2.6 to +3.4 | 2,333 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | NJIT | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -3.0 | -4.0 to -1.7 | Sufficient evidence | -2.0 | -1.0 | +1.6range +1.2 to +2.2 | 2,826 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | NJIT | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.2 | -2.2 to -0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -1.1 | -0.1 | +1.1range +0.8 to +1.4 | 1,162 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 33:08 | 27:30 | 10:32–36:51 | |
| Points | 16.4 | 14.6 | 3.0–24.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 47.2% | 44.2% | 16.7%–64.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-10 | Vermont | L 54–63 | 36:27 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9-19 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 52.6% |
| 2026-03-07 | Maine | W 60–58 | 35:58 | 21 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 9-14 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 64.3% |
| 2026-03-03 | UMBC | L 52–91 | 21:32 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Bryant | L 52–69 | 36:51 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7-21 | 0-2 | 1-3 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-21 | Vermont | L 64–70 | 34:52 | 16 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-14 | 0-1 | 6-7 | 35.7% |
| 2026-02-19 | UAlbany | L 63–81 | 36:39 | 18 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7-15 | 0-2 | 4-9 | 46.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | Maine | W 67–58 | 35:27 | 23 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 9-15 | 1-2 | 4-6 | 63.3% |
| 2026-02-12 | New Hampshire | W 76–70 | 34:21 | 23 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10-18 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 58.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | Binghamton | W 73–64 | 34:25 | 14 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-14 | 0-2 | 4-8 | 35.7% |
| 2026-02-05 | UMass Lowell | W 81–56 | 29:43 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3-11 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 27.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | Vermont | W 79–77 | 35:32 | 22 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 8-14 | 1-1 | 5-8 | 60.7% |
| 2026-01-29 | UAlbany | W 77–68 | 33:27 | 17 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7-15 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 46.7% |
| 2026-01-22 | UMBC | L 74–87 | 31:33 | 19 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-17 | 1-2 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-19 | Bryant | W 79–55 | 34:41 | 22 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8-15 | 1-3 | 5-7 | 56.7% |
| 2026-01-15 | UMass Lowell | W 73–64 | 34:38 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8-17 | 0-3 | 4-6 | 47.1% |
| 2026-01-10 | Maine | L 70–74 | 34:40 | 24 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9-16 | 0-1 | 6-8 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-08 | New Hampshire | W 80–76 | 10:32 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-03 | Binghamton | W 73–65 | 29:21 | 22 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-12 | 1-2 | 7-7 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-31 | Penn | L 61–80 | 21:22 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 30.0% |
| 2025-12-22 · NCAA | Butler | L 52–101 | 27:00 | 15 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 7-17 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 41.2% |
| 2025-12-13 | Sacred Heart | L 49–65 | 22:42 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2-10 | 0-2 | 4-5 | 20.0% |
| 2025-12-10 | New Haven | W 70–64 | 16:35 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 8-10 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-05 | High Point | L 72–89 | 17:05 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-8 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 31.3% |
| 2025-11-28 | Eastern Mich. | L 55–73 | 22:41 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-8 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 56.3% |
| 2025-11-26 | Louisville | L 47–104 | 22:33 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 38.9% |
| 2025-11-24 | Cincinnati | L 67–94 | 16:03 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 4-8 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 56.3% |
| 2025-11-22 | Navy | L 70–86 | 18:31 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 4-5 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-18 | Drexel | L 43–75 | 17:33 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-08 | Fairfield | L 53–74 | 14:32 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 20.0% |