Quadir Copeland
NC State · 2025–26 · 34 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season
Logged performance
982:43 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 34
- Minutes per game
- 28:54
- Points per game
- 13.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.6 / 6.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 13.9 | 3.6 | 6.5 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 3.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.3 | 5.0 | 9.0 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 3.9 | 4.2 |
| Season totals | 474 | 123 | 222 | 61 | 5 | 96 | 102 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 155–314 | 49.4% | 9.2 | 12.8 |
| 2P | 132–256 | 51.6% | 7.5 | 10.4 |
| 3P | 23–58 | 39.7% | 1.7 | 2.4 |
| FT | 141–182 | 77.5% | 5.4 | 7.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.0% | 60.1% | 18.5% | 58.0% | 2.31 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
NC State · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $720K
- 80% range $450K to $1.35M
- Median share of team pool
- 19.2%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $5.00M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $720K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 71.6%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
NC State: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | NC State | $720Kspeculative | $450K to $1.35M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +4.5 | +3.1 to +5.9 | Sufficient evidence | +3.6 | +0.9 | +7.4range +6.6 to +8.3 | 3,328 | Prior built from the box-score line only, without a prior-season value. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 32:24 | 28:54 | 18:26–41:22 | |
| Points | 15.2 | 13.9 | 3.0–28.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 45.0% | 54.6% | 20.0%–116.7% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-17 | Texas | L 66–68 | 34:25 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7-16 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 43.8% |
| 2026-03-12 | Virginia | L 74–81 | 36:34 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3-10 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 30.0% |
| 2026-03-11 | Pittsburgh | W 98–88 | 36:02 | 24 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 10-12 | 70.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Stanford | L 84–85 | 28:58 | 16 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 6-13 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 46.2% |
| 2026-03-02 | Duke | L 64–93 | 26:00 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-10 | 1-3 | 4-6 | 35.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Notre Dame | L 90–96 | 41:22 | 17 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 7-8 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-24 | Virginia | L 61–90 | 22:09 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-17 | North Carolina | W 82–58 | 32:08 | 20 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-16 | 0-0 | 6-8 | 43.8% |
| 2026-02-14 | Miami (FL) | L 76–77 | 26:50 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-10 | 1-5 | 4-5 | 35.0% |
| 2026-02-09 | Louisville | L 77–118 | 20:58 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 4-10 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Virginia Tech | W 82–73 | 32:10 | 21 | 3 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7-11 | 0-1 | 7-10 | 63.6% |
| 2026-02-03 | SMU | W 84–83 | 32:29 | 7 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 4-6 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | Wake Forest | W 96–78 | 23:57 | 8 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-9 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-27 | Syracuse | W 88–68 | 33:02 | 19 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 9-9 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-24 | Pittsburgh | W 81–72 | 35:57 | 20 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 6-11 | 0-1 | 8-9 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-20 | Clemson | W 80–76 | 40:50 | 16 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-10 | 1-2 | 7-9 | 45.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Georgia Tech | L 74–78 | 28:32 | 16 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6-17 | 3-8 | 1-3 | 44.1% |
| 2026-01-10 | Florida St. | W 113–69 | 18:26 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-06 | Boston College | W 79–71 | 25:11 | 8 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Virginia | L 61–76 | 34:00 | 15 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-11 | 2-4 | 3-4 | 54.5% |
| 2025-12-31 | Wake Forest | W 70–57 | 31:16 | 14 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 5-11 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 45.5% |
| 2025-12-21 | Ole Miss | W 76–62 | 32:11 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6-8 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 87.5% |
| 2025-12-17 | Texas Southern | W 108–72 | 18:38 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 70.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Kansas | L 76–77 | 39:39 | 19 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 6-14 | 0-1 | 7-7 | 42.9% |
| 2025-12-10 | Liberty | W 85–45 | 23:51 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 2-3 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | UNC Asheville | W 75–63 | 24:58 | 13 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 4-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Auburn | L 73–83 | 27:48 | 22 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-12 | 2-3 | 4-6 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | Texas | L 97–102 | 33:07 | 28 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 10-14 | 2-3 | 6-10 | 78.6% |
| 2025-11-25 | Boise St. | W 81–70 | 22:50 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 4-5 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Seton Hall | L 74–85 | 27:24 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-17 | VCU | W 85–79 | 23:12 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-12 | UNC Greensboro | W 110–64 | 23:53 | 13 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-7 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 78.6% |
| 2025-11-07 | UAB | W 94–70 | 25:19 | 18 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 5-7 | 2-3 | 6-7 | 85.7% |
| 2025-11-03 | N.C. Central | W 114–66 | 18:37 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 8-10 | 116.7% |