Victor Valdes
Troy · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
950:20 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 29:42
- Points per game
- 14.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.0 / 4.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.9 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 3.4 | 2.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 20.0 | 5.4 | 6.1 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 4.6 | 4.0 |
| Season totals | 476 | 129 | 145 | 42 | 13 | 110 | 94 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 141–352 | 40.1% | 11.0 | 14.8 |
| 2P | 112–227 | 49.3% | 7.1 | 9.6 |
| 3P | 29–125 | 23.2% | 3.9 | 5.3 |
| FT | 165–218 | 75.7% | 6.8 | 9.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.2% | 53.1% | 35.5% | 61.9% | 1.32 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Troy · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $39K
- 80% range $13K to $110K
- Median share of team pool
- 14.2%
- team pool $295K, 80% range $105K to $775K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $32K to $43K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 73.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Troy: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Troy | $39Kspeculative | $13K to $110K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.9 | +0.7 to +2.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.3 | +0.6 | +6.1range +5.4 to +6.7 | 2,644 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Troy | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.4 | -2.6 to -0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | -1.1 | +1.4range +1.1 to +1.9 | 1,590 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Troy | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.1 | -1.0 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | +0.3 | +1.5range +1.2 to +1.9 | 1,408 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 27:27 | 29:42 | 17:50–39:14 | |
| Points | 12.8 | 14.9 | 5.0–29.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 54.3% | 45.0% | 10.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-19 | Nebraska | L 47–76 | 26:26 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 4-7 | 4-6 | 2-2 | 85.7% |
| 2026-03-09 | Ga. Southern | W 77–61 | 30:35 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4-7 | 0-2 | 4-6 | 57.1% |
| 2026-03-08 | Southern Miss. | W 78–70 | 25:25 | 13 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 3-10 | 0-3 | 7-9 | 30.0% |
| 2026-02-27 | ULM | W 80–65 | 26:47 | 13 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5-9 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 61.1% |
| 2026-02-24 | Louisiana | W 78–59 | 28:04 | 12 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-8 | 0-3 | 6-6 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-21 | South Alabama | L 54–65 | 33:57 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1-6 | 0-2 | 5-6 | 16.7% |
| 2026-02-18 | ULM | W 77–76 | 22:58 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-8 | 1-3 | 7-8 | 43.8% |
| 2026-02-14 | Southern Miss. | L 65–69 | 30:17 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 4-9 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 44.4% |
| 2026-02-11 | Texas St. | L 62–74 | 29:53 | 22 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 5-12 | 0-5 | 12-16 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-07 | Akron | W 79–69 | 28:46 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2-12 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Georgia St. | W 74–63 | 32:40 | 12 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-8 | 0-3 | 6-7 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | App State | L 44–66 | 25:23 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-9 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 22.2% |
| 2026-01-29 | James Madison | L 64–73 | 26:27 | 16 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 5-9 | 45.8% |
| 2026-01-24 | Ga. Southern | W 83–78 | 28:39 | 22 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-14 | 2-6 | 8-10 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Old Dominion | W 83–77 | 37:41 | 21 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 3-15 | 1-5 | 14-18 | 23.3% |
| 2026-01-17 | Arkansas St. | W 99–74 | 34:13 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 6-11 | 1-6 | 4-5 | 59.1% |
| 2026-01-14 | Southern Miss. | W 91–65 | 29:37 | 19 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6-11 | 2-5 | 5-6 | 63.6% |
| 2026-01-10 | Louisiana | W 90–70 | 17:50 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4-5 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Arkansas St. | L 74–86 | 27:46 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 1-10 | 0-3 | 5-8 | 10.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | South Alabama | W 59–49 | 31:20 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-11 | 0-6 | 3-4 | 27.3% |
| 2025-12-31 | Texas St. | W 100–80 | 24:07 | 11 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 5-10 | 42.9% |
| 2025-12-20 | Marshall | W 70–63 | 31:38 | 18 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 6-14 | 0-3 | 6-9 | 42.9% |
| 2025-12-14 | UAB | W 86–85 | 28:35 | 26 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7-15 | 2-5 | 10-11 | 53.3% |
| 2025-12-01 | West Ga. | L 89–93 | 38:01 | 29 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 7-14 | 2-5 | 13-16 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-26 | Saint Francis | W 74–64 | 23:33 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 6-11 | 0-2 | 2-5 | 54.5% |
| 2025-11-24 | Toledo | L 68–75 | 33:11 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1-11 | 1-6 | 2-2 | 13.6% |
| 2025-11-20 | Southern California | L 106–107 | 39:14 | 24 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 9-24 | 1-6 | 5-5 | 39.6% |
| 2025-11-18 | San Diego St. | W 108–107 | 32:43 | 20 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8-15 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 56.7% |
| 2025-11-16 | CSUN | L 85–94 | 30:30 | 16 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-11 | 1-6 | 5-7 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | LMU (CA) | L 63–74 | 31:00 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 3-5 | 45.8% |
| 2025-11-07 | Furman | W 64–61 | 27:10 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4-10 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 45.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Kent St. | W 103–97 | 35:54 | 23 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-14 | 2-5 | 7-7 | 57.1% |