Austin Cross
Troy · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
508:29 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 15:53
- Points per game
- 3.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.5 / 0.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.2 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 7.9 | 3.7 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 2.6 |
| Season totals | 101 | 47 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 12 | 33 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 34–106 | 32.1% | 3.3 | 8.3 |
| 2P | 10–27 | 37.0%† | 0.8 | 2.1 |
| 3P | 24–79 | 30.4% | 2.5 | 6.2 |
| FT | 9–18 | 50.0%† | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43.4% | 44.3% | 74.5% | 17.0% | 0.83 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Troy · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $9K
- 80% range $2K to $32K
- Median share of team pool
- 3.8%
- team pool $295K, 80% range $105K to $775K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $7K to $10K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 37.5%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Troy: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Troy | $9Kspeculative | $2K to $32K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.5 | -2.0 to +0.8 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | +0.0 | +2.5range +2.0 to +2.9 | 1,355 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 18:56 | 15:53 | 11:33–24:11 | |
| Points | 3.8 | 3.2 | 0.0–9.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 63.4% | 50.2% | 0.0%–150.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-19 | Nebraska | L 47–76 | 20:36 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 14.3% |
| 2026-03-09 | Ga. Southern | W 77–61 | 15:22 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-08 | Southern Miss. | W 78–70 | 15:03 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-27 | ULM | W 80–65 | 24:11 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-24 | Louisiana | W 78–59 | 19:30 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 150.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | South Alabama | L 54–65 | 16:51 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | ULM | W 77–76 | 15:05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Southern Miss. | L 65–69 | 21:43 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-7 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 64.3% |
| 2026-02-11 | Texas St. | L 62–74 | 19:32 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Akron | W 79–69 | 16:14 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Georgia St. | W 74–63 | 12:36 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | App State | L 44–66 | 15:51 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-29 | James Madison | L 64–73 | 16:12 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Ga. Southern | W 83–78 | 13:17 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-21 | Old Dominion | W 83–77 | 11:33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Arkansas St. | W 99–74 | 11:43 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Southern Miss. | W 91–65 | 12:44 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Louisiana | W 90–70 | 13:00 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Arkansas St. | L 74–86 | 11:47 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | South Alabama | W 59–49 | 13:17 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | Texas St. | W 100–80 | 13:46 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Marshall | W 70–63 | 12:35 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 150.0% |
| 2025-12-14 | UAB | W 86–85 | 14:36 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-01 | West Ga. | L 89–93 | 12:42 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | Saint Francis | W 74–64 | 17:24 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Toledo | L 68–75 | 16:38 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-20 | Southern California | L 106–107 | 20:44 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | San Diego St. | W 108–107 | 21:28 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-16 | CSUN | L 85–94 | 14:27 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | LMU (CA) | L 63–74 | 14:11 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | Furman | W 64–61 | 15:08 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Kent St. | W 103–97 | 18:43 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 30.0% |