John Camden
California · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1004:13 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 31:23
- Points per game
- 13.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.7 / 1.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 13.7 | 4.7 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 2.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 17.4 | 5.9 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 3.2 |
| Season totals | 437 | 149 | 51 | 23 | 5 | 32 | 80 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 140–314 | 44.6% | 9.8 | 12.5 |
| 2P | 57–102 | 55.9% | 3.2 | 4.1 |
| 3P | 83–212 | 39.2% | 6.6 | 8.4 |
| FT | 74–92 | 80.4% | 2.9 | 3.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.8% | 61.6% | 67.5% | 29.3% | 1.59 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
California · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $825K
- 80% range $520K to $1.60M
- Median share of team pool
- 22.4%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $825K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $22K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 75.6%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
California: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | California | $825Kspeculative | $520K to $1.60M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.9 | +2.6 to +5.2 | Sufficient evidence | +2.5 | +1.4 | +6.9range +6.2 to +7.7 | 3,383 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Delaware | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.3 | -0.9 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +2.4 | -2.2 | +4.9range +4.2 to +5.8 | 3,714 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Virginia Tech | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.5 | -2.5 to -0.6 | Limited evidence | -0.1 | -1.4 | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.5 | 457 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 31:48 | 31:23 | 22:35–42:24 | |
| Points | 10.6 | 13.7 | 2.0–26.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 44.8% | 57.6% | 0.0%–110.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-18 | UIC | W 91–73 | 28:45 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-15 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 43.3% |
| 2026-03-11 | Florida St. | L 89–95 | 31:46 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-10 | 3-8 | 0-1 | 55.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Wake Forest | L 73–80 | 34:07 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-9 | 1-7 | 3-4 | 27.8% |
| 2026-03-04 | Georgia Tech | W 76–65 | 32:10 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3-7 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 57.1% |
| 2026-02-28 | Pittsburgh | L 56–72 | 32:10 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-11 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 40.9% |
| 2026-02-25 | SMU | W 73–69 | 32:44 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-11 | 2-7 | 2-2 | 54.5% |
| 2026-02-21 | Stanford | W 72–66 | 35:37 | 18 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6-14 | 3-9 | 3-4 | 53.6% |
| 2026-02-14 | Boston College | W 86–75 | 35:02 | 15 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-7 | 4-7 | 3-5 | 85.7% |
| 2026-02-11 | Syracuse | L 100–107 | 42:24 | 21 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6-12 | 5-11 | 4-4 | 70.8% |
| 2026-02-07 | Clemson | L 55–77 | 27:40 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1-7 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 14.3% |
| 2026-02-04 | Georgia Tech | W 90–85 | 34:31 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-5 | 3-4 | 4-6 | 110.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Miami (FL) | W 86–85 | 33:56 | 26 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7-10 | 4-5 | 8-9 | 90.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | Florida St. | L 61–63 | 32:45 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-9 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 44.4% |
| 2026-01-24 | Stanford | W 78–66 | 32:44 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8-13 | 5-8 | 4-5 | 80.8% |
| 2026-01-17 | North Carolina | W 84–78 | 34:54 | 20 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7-14 | 4-8 | 2-3 | 64.3% |
| 2026-01-14 | Duke | L 56–71 | 23:41 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4-6 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 91.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | Virginia Tech | L 75–78 | 22:35 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-5 | 0-4 | 2-3 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Virginia | L 60–84 | 29:17 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 5-8 | 1-4 | 4-5 | 68.8% |
| 2026-01-02 | Notre Dame | W 72–71 | 31:09 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-10 | 1-9 | 0-0 | 15.0% |
| 2025-12-30 | Louisville | L 70–90 | 32:07 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-10 | 1-7 | 0-1 | 15.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | Columbia | W 74–56 | 31:35 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-12 | 3-8 | 2-2 | 54.2% |
| 2025-12-19 | Morgan St. | W 97–50 | 32:24 | 23 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8-12 | 5-7 | 2-2 | 87.5% |
| 2025-12-13 | Northwestern St. | W 79–70 | 36:26 | 25 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-11 | 6-9 | 5-7 | 90.9% |
| 2025-12-06 | Pacific | W 67–61 | 32:06 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-11 | 2-7 | 1-2 | 54.5% |
| 2025-12-02 | Utah | W 79–72 | 30:15 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-7 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 78.6% |
| 2025-11-25 | UCLA | W 80–72 | 25:03 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Sacramento St. | W 91–67 | 27:30 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-12 | 4-10 | 0-0 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-18 | Presbyterian | W 67–57 | 28:53 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-12 | 2-6 | 6-7 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-13 | Kansas St. | L 96–99 | 31:59 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-10 | Cal St. Fullerton | W 93–65 | 28:39 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-15 | 3-10 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-06 | Wright St. | W 77–67 | 35:09 | 12 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-8 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | CSU Bakersfield | W 87–60 | 24:10 | 22 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7-11 | 3-7 | 5-5 | 77.3% |