Andrew Meadow
Boise St. · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
900:26 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 30:01
- Points per game
- 12.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.3 / 1.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.0 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 1.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.0 | 4.4 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.7 |
| Season totals | 360 | 100 | 30 | 18 | 1 | 26 | 39 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 125–243 | 51.4% | 8.1 | 10.8 |
| 2P | 84–137 | 61.3% | 4.6 | 6.1 |
| 3P | 41–106 | 38.7% | 3.5 | 4.7 |
| FT | 69–106 | 65.1% | 3.5 | 4.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59.9% | 62.1% | 43.6% | 43.6% | 1.15 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Boise St · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $115K
- 80% range $32K to $290K
- Median share of team pool
- 13.1%
- team pool $980K, 80% range $410K to $2.15M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $91K to $120K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $7K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 73.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Boise St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Boise St | $115Kspeculative | $32K to $290K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.3 | +0.0 to +2.4 | Sufficient evidence | +1.8 | -0.5 | +5.5range +4.8 to +6.1 | 2,502 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Boise St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.1 | -0.3 to +2.5 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | -0.5 | +4.0range +3.2 to +4.9 | 2,569 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Boise St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.3 | -2.0 to -0.7 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | -1.2 | +0.8range +0.6 to +0.9 | 741 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 32:28 | 30:01 | 17:03–50:35 | |
| Points | 12.8 | 12.0 | 2.0–25.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 50.8% | 60.7% | 22.2%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-11 | San Jose St. | L 74–84 | 36:02 | 17 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-12 | 2-5 | 3-3 | 58.3% |
| 2026-03-07 | Colorado St. | W 78–67 | 29:20 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 6-6 | 35.7% |
| 2026-03-03 | San Diego St. | W 86–77 | 29:27 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-9 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 61.1% |
| 2026-02-28 | Fresno St. | W 69–53 | 33:41 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-15 | 3-10 | 1-3 | 43.3% |
| 2026-02-24 | Wyoming | W 72–62 | 33:52 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-9 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 55.6% |
| 2026-02-21 | San Jose St. | W 84–69 | 32:44 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5-10 | 2-4 | 4-4 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Utah St. | L 56–75 | 32:16 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-7 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-13 | UNLV | L 83–86 | 26:45 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | New Mexico | W 91–90 | 25:02 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-03 | Nevada | W 91–87 | 36:28 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-9 | 0-3 | 4-9 | 22.2% |
| 2026-01-30 | Grand Canyon | L 69–86 | 29:48 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 0-3 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-27 | San Jose St. | W 89–58 | 24:36 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7-12 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | Air Force | W 96–54 | 17:03 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-20 | Wyoming | W 81–65 | 27:20 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8-10 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 95.0% |
| 2026-01-16 | Colorado St. | W 79–73 | 33:52 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-9 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 72.2% |
| 2026-01-13 | UNLV | L 85–89 | 38:32 | 21 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8-12 | 0-2 | 5-8 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | Utah St. | L 68–93 | 20:59 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Grand Canyon | L 58–75 | 32:45 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | San Diego St. | L 107–110 | 50:35 | 25 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9-19 | 2-7 | 5-6 | 52.6% |
| 2025-12-30 | New Mexico | W 62–53 | 22:10 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Nevada | L 66–81 | 28:28 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-8 | 2-4 | 4-9 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-14 | Saint Mary's (CA) | W 68–67 | 27:17 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-7 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 28.6% |
| 2025-12-10 | Duquesne | W 86–64 | 24:28 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-06 · NCAA | Butler | W 77–68 | 23:42 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-25 | NC State | L 70–81 | 28:42 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 4-7 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Southern California | L 67–70 | 25:28 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 56.3% |
| 2025-11-18 | Wichita St. | W 62–59 | 35:06 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5-9 | 3-5 | 2-3 | 72.2% |
| 2025-11-15 | Montana St. | W 62–58 | 27:34 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-9 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 77.8% |
| 2025-11-11 | UTRGV | W 85–65 | 33:39 | 21 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8-12 | 2-4 | 3-5 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Utah Valley | W 101–77 | 32:45 | 18 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-10 | 1-4 | 5-6 | 65.0% |