Ethan Copeland
Stetson · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
973:04 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 32:26
- Points per game
- 14.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.8 / 2.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.6 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.0 | 4.7 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 1.5 |
| Season totals | 438 | 114 | 62 | 44 | 2 | 41 | 36 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 150–347 | 43.2% | 11.6 | 14.3 |
| 2P | 56–120 | 46.7% | 4.0 | 4.9 |
| 3P | 94–227 | 41.4% | 7.6 | 9.3 |
| FT | 44–52 | 84.6% | 1.7 | 2.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56.8% | 59.2% | 65.4% | 15.0% | 1.51 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Stetson · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $47K
- 80% range $10K to $155K
- Median share of team pool
- 18.5%
- team pool $235K, 80% range $88K to $635K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $45K to $47K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 79.1%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Stetson: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Stetson | $47Kspeculative | $10K to $155K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.3 | -0.7 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +1.1 | -0.9 | +4.1range +3.6 to +4.6 | 2,775 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 36:07 | 32:26 | 19:55–39:58 | |
| Points | 18.6 | 14.6 | 2.0–27.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 65.2% | 54.3% | 11.1%–89.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | Austin Peay | L 60–69 | 38:45 | 22 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7-16 | 6-12 | 2-2 | 62.5% |
| 2026-03-04 | Eastern Ky. | W 92–76 | 35:48 | 23 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8-14 | 5-10 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-28 · NCAA | FGCU | W 78–63 | 38:24 | 22 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9-14 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 78.6% |
| 2026-02-26 | Jacksonville | L 85–89 | 35:47 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-10 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 55.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | North Florida | W 76–71 | 31:51 | 15 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-10 | 3-7 | 4-6 | 55.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | Central Ark. | L 76–88 | 38:12 | 27 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9-18 | 7-11 | 2-2 | 69.4% |
| 2026-02-14 | FGCU | L 76–78 | 39:58 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-15 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 56.7% |
| 2026-02-11 | Jacksonville | W 67–62 | 35:50 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 6-6 | 68.8% |
| 2026-02-07 | Eastern Ky. | L 88–100 | 31:40 | 23 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8-13 | 5-9 | 2-2 | 80.8% |
| 2026-02-05 | Bellarmine | L 71–92 | 30:44 | 18 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-15 | 6-14 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | North Ala. | L 66–68 | 33:14 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2-11 | 1-5 | 4-5 | 22.7% |
| 2026-01-29 | North Florida | W 84–77 | 38:01 | 25 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8-13 | 6-9 | 3-6 | 84.6% |
| 2026-01-23 | Austin Peay | L 65–73 | 35:41 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-11 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | Lipscomb | L 74–79 | 31:27 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-9 | 0-5 | 2-2 | 11.1% |
| 2026-01-17 | Queens (NC) | L 81–87 | 37:51 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-14 | 2-8 | 3-4 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-15 | West Ga. | W 95–86 | 36:35 | 18 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-10 | 3-5 | 5-5 | 65.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Austin Peay | L 69–81 | 36:22 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4-16 | 4-15 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-08 | Lipscomb | W 91–83 | 24:39 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-11 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-03 | Central Ark. | L 73–93 | 25:11 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-10 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-01 | North Ala. | W 70–67 | 32:06 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-11 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 40.9% |
| 2025-12-22 | Oklahoma | L 54–107 | 29:54 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-13 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 53.8% |
| 2025-12-06 | South Carolina | L 51–82 | 21:09 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-8 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | Grand Canyon | L 45–67 | 24:25 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 1-7 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 14.3% |
| 2025-11-30 | Robert Morris | L 62–80 | 36:24 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5-14 | 3-9 | 3-4 | 46.4% |
| 2025-11-29 | Southern Utah | L 68–70 | 36:18 | 20 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8-14 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 71.4% |
| 2025-11-25 | Wright St. | L 62–79 | 33:30 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4-8 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-22 | VMI | W 99–80 | 33:46 | 25 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9-14 | 7-12 | 0-0 | 89.3% |
| 2025-11-19 | Howard | W 64–60 | 19:55 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-16 | Western Caro. | L 65–76 | 26:19 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-10 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Rhode Island | L 62–93 | 23:18 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-7 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 42.9% |