Tyler Tejada
Towson · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1114:58 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 35:58
- Points per game
- 17.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.4 / 2.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 17.9 | 5.4 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.9 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
| Season totals | 556 | 167 | 69 | 26 | 13 | 52 | 50 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 191–443 | 43.1% | 14.3 | 15.9 |
| 2P | 149–299 | 49.8% | 9.6 | 10.7 |
| 3P | 42–144 | 29.2% | 4.6 | 5.2 |
| FT | 132–150 | 88.0% | 4.8 | 5.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.9% | 54.6% | 32.5% | 33.9% | 1.33 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Towson · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $33K
- 80% range $7K to $99K
- Median share of team pool
- 14.8%
- team pool $260K, 80% range $97K to $675K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $31K to $34K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 86.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Towson: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Towson | $33Kspeculative | $7K to $99K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.6 | -0.6 to +1.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | -0.3 | +6.5range +5.6 to +7.3 | 3,559 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Towson | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.0 | -0.2 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.9 | -0.9 | +3.8range +3.2 to +4.4 | 2,403 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Towson | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.1 | -1.4 to +1.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | -0.1 | +2.4range +1.9 to +3.2 | 2,203 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 40:05 | 35:58 | 22:08–44:37 | |
| Points | 24.4 | 17.9 | 6.0–35.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 58.1% | 46.7% | 23.1%–76.5% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-09 | Hofstra | L 65–68 | 44:37 | 29 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9-23 | 2-6 | 9-10 | 43.5% |
| 2026-03-08 | Col. of Charleston | W 81–56 | 36:58 | 30 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 11-17 | 4-5 | 4-4 | 76.5% |
| 2026-03-07 | Hampton | W 74–68 | 39:00 | 35 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 12-21 | 1-2 | 10-10 | 59.5% |
| 2026-03-03 | Stony Brook | W 69–57 | 39:52 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Campbell | W 71–67 | 39:59 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4-9 | 3-4 | 6-6 | 61.1% |
| 2026-02-26 | Elon | W 58–56 | 38:31 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2-8 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-22 | Drexel | L 62–68 | 39:59 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-13 | 0-2 | 5-7 | 30.8% |
| 2026-02-15 | Monmouth | L 71–72 | 32:31 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5-13 | 1-4 | 5-5 | 42.3% |
| 2026-02-12 | Stony Brook | W 69–57 | 34:37 | 33 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 13-20 | 2-5 | 5-5 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Hofstra | L 49–71 | 25:52 | 17 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-12 | 2-2 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | UNCW | L 73–82 | 36:58 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-11 | 0-4 | 6-7 | 45.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | N.C. A&T | L 73–80 | 32:33 | 22 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7-17 | 2-7 | 6-7 | 47.1% |
| 2026-01-22 | Elon | W 72–59 | 31:42 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-11 | 2-4 | 3-5 | 45.5% |
| 2026-01-19 | Drexel | W 59–58 | 37:34 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5-15 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-15 | Col. of Charleston | W 61–52 | 37:20 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-15 | 0-7 | 1-1 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | Northeastern | W 87–78 | 31:05 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 5-12 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 45.8% |
| 2026-01-08 | Hofstra | L 67–78 | 39:47 | 22 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6-20 | 2-6 | 8-9 | 35.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Monmouth | L 48–62 | 35:56 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2-8 | 2-5 | 3-4 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-31 | Hampton | L 62–63 | 36:34 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-13 | 0-3 | 10-13 | 23.1% |
| 2025-12-29 | William & Mary | L 70–84 | 38:10 | 13 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5-11 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | Sacred Heart | W 72–47 | 35:49 | 22 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9-18 | 3-9 | 1-2 | 58.3% |
| 2025-12-16 | Kansas | L 49–73 | 22:08 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-12 | 0-5 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-07 | UCF | L 61–86 | 27:33 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5-12 | 2-8 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Cornell | W 93–80 | 37:47 | 26 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 9-18 | 6-10 | 2-2 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-26 | UC San Diego | L 73–87 | 37:09 | 27 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 10-19 | 2-5 | 5-5 | 57.9% |
| 2025-11-25 | Liberty | W 72–69 | 35:56 | 20 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 8-17 | 0-6 | 4-4 | 47.1% |
| 2025-11-24 | Rhode Island | W 62–55 | 36:34 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-9 | 0-1 | 6-6 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-18 | James Madison | L 75–81 | 36:36 | 21 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9-20 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 47.5% |
| 2025-11-14 | Norfolk St. | W 51–41 | 39:14 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4-13 | 1-6 | 2-2 | 34.6% |
| 2025-11-08 | Houston | L 48–65 | 38:06 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5-14 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 39.3% |
| 2025-11-03 | Loyola Maryland | W 67–56 | 38:31 | 24 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8-14 | 1-3 | 7-9 | 60.7% |