Kobe Rodgers
Louisville · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
465:34 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 14:06
- Points per game
- 3.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.6 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.3 | 2.6 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 9.4 | 7.3 | 4.3 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 5.7 |
| Season totals | 109 | 85 | 50 | 30 | 5 | 26 | 66 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 35–75 | 46.7%† | 2.3 | 6.4 |
| 2P | 25–44 | 56.8%† | 1.3 | 3.8 |
| 3P | 10–31 | 32.3%† | 0.9 | 2.7 |
| FT | 29–33 | 87.9% | 1.0 | 2.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.3%† | 60.9%† | 41.3%† | 44.0%† | 1.92 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Louisville · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $160K
- 80% range $58K to $265K
- Median share of team pool
- 4.8%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $160K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $25K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 34.4%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Louisville: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Louisville | $160Kspeculative | $58K to $265K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.8 | +0.4 to +3.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | +1.1 | +2.4range +2.1 to +2.8 | 1,619 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Col Charleston | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.8 | +1.7 to +4.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.8 | +1.0 | +3.2range +2.6 to +3.7 | 2,219 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 18:47 | 14:06 | 1:56–28:15 | |
| Points | 1.6 | 3.3 | 0.0–12.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 11.7% | 52.9% | 0.0%–150.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-21 | Michigan St. | L 69–77 | 23:58 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-19 | South Fla. | W 83–79 | 20:36 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-12 | Miami (FL) | L 73–78 | 8:30 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-03-11 | SMU | W 62–58 | 13:21 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Syracuse | W 77–62 | 27:28 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Clemson | L 75–80 | 7:58 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-23 | North Carolina | L 74–77 | 8:59 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Georgia Tech | W 87–70 | 10:03 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 125.0% |
| 2026-02-17 | SMU | L 85–95 | 8:07 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 150.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Baylor | W 82–71 | 5:37 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-09 | NC State | W 118–77 | 11:06 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Wake Forest | W 88–80 | 12:29 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Notre Dame | W 76–65 | 12:01 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | SMU | W 88–74 | 11:52 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-26 | Duke | L 52–83 | 1:56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-24 | Virginia Tech | W 85–71 | 11:20 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Pittsburgh | W 100–59 | 19:02 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 87.5% |
| 2026-01-13 | Virginia | L 70–79 | 14:48 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-10 | Boston College | W 75–62 | 28:15 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-06 | Duke | L 73–84 | 18:41 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-02 | Stanford | L 76–80 | 13:05 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-30 | California | W 90–70 | 22:19 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-16 | Tennessee | L 62–83 | 8:53 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-13 | Memphis | W 99–73 | 14:01 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Indiana | W 87–78 | 13:08 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 125.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Arkansas | L 80–89 | 8:35 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-11-26 | NJIT | W 104–47 | 19:18 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-24 | Eastern Mich. | W 87–46 | 16:42 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Cincinnati | W 74–64 | 8:53 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 150.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Ohio | W 106–81 | 14:48 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Kentucky | W 96–88 | 7:00 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-06 | Jackson St. | W 106–70 | 17:35 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-03 | South Carolina St. | W 104–45 | 25:10 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1-5 | 1-4 | 6-6 | 30.0% |