Kobi Williams
Missouri St. · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1077:38 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 35:55
- Points per game
- 14.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.6 / 1.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.2 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 2.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.8 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 3.0 |
| Season totals | 426 | 77 | 43 | 28 | 6 | 47 | 80 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 121–301 | 40.2% | 10.0 | 11.2 |
| 2P | 44–92 | 47.8%† | 3.1 | 3.4 |
| 3P | 77–209 | 36.8% | 7.0 | 7.8 |
| FT | 107–129 | 82.9% | 4.3 | 4.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.0% | 59.5% | 69.4% | 42.9% | 0.91 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Missouri St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $20K
- 80% range $2K to $78K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.8%
- team pool $260K, 80% range $94K to $755K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $19K to $22K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 85.5%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Missouri St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Missouri St | $20Kspeculative | $2K to $78K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.5 | -1.6 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.9 | -1.5 | +5.5range +4.8 to +6.2 | 3,463 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:24 | 35:55 | 25:58–45:09 | |
| Points | 10.6 | 14.2 | 2.0–32.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 42.1% | 51.1% | 0.0%–104.5% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | Louisiana Tech | L 66–69 | 35:17 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-6 | 0-5 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-11 | Liberty | W 77–69 | 39:56 | 19 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5-12 | 3-6 | 6-7 | 54.2% |
| 2026-03-10 | FIU | W 75–72 | 36:24 | 15 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6-11 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 68.2% |
| 2026-03-07 | Middle Tenn. | L 63–75 | 34:11 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-10 | 3-8 | 1-1 | 55.0% |
| 2026-03-05 | Western Ky. | W 87–74 | 26:14 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | Sam Houston | L 81–86 | 39:57 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-11 | 4-9 | 2-2 | 54.5% |
| 2026-02-26 | Louisiana Tech | L 70–72 | 36:47 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-5 | 2-4 | 6-6 | 80.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | FIU | L 67–70 | 36:54 | 25 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9-18 | 4-10 | 3-3 | 61.1% |
| 2026-02-18 | Kennesaw St. | L 87–91 | 38:38 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-11 | 1-9 | 6-9 | 31.8% |
| 2026-02-14 | Delaware | L 67–76 | 37:24 | 25 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7-14 | 5-11 | 6-7 | 67.9% |
| 2026-02-12 | Louisiana Tech | L 78–79 | 36:39 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8-19 | 6-15 | 2-2 | 57.9% |
| 2026-02-07 | Liberty | L 76–79 | 35:03 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Jacksonville St. | W 74–67 | 36:56 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 5-11 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | UTEP | W 62–57 | 36:57 | 21 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-12 | 4-8 | 5-5 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-22 | New Mexico St. | W 84–75 | 38:26 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-10 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 65.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Middle Tenn. | L 87–90 | 45:09 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-14 | 4-9 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Western Ky. | L 72–87 | 36:00 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2-12 | 2-12 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | FIU | W 79–71 | 38:16 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-11 | 3-10 | 5-5 | 40.9% |
| 2026-01-07 | Kennesaw St. | L 80–90 | 37:34 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5-13 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-04 | New Mexico St. | W 89–82 | 38:50 | 32 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8-11 | 7-9 | 9-10 | 104.5% |
| 2026-01-02 | UTEP | W 79–55 | 38:08 | 20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-11 | 3-7 | 9-10 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | Delaware | W 61–43 | 28:10 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-5 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-23 | Lindenwood | W 70–65 | 39:35 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4-8 | 3-7 | 1-2 | 68.8% |
| 2025-12-16 | Oral Roberts | W 63–62 | 31:44 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2-8 | 2-5 | 6-6 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-12 | Xavier | L 57–75 | 35:42 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 2-3 | 43.8% |
| 2025-12-06 | Tulsa | L 74–98 | 29:02 | 20 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7-10 | 3-4 | 3-5 | 85.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | LIU | L 61–75 | 35:36 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-8 | 1-5 | 5-7 | 43.8% |
| 2025-11-22 | UTRGV | W 74–67 | 34:55 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-11 | 2-9 | 3-4 | 36.4% |
| 2025-11-15 | UT Arlington | L 49–67 | 37:16 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0-7 | 0-5 | 4-4 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Arkansas St. | L 85–86 | 25:58 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1-6 | 0-5 | 5-6 | 16.7% |