Freddy Hicks
Tarleton St. · 2025–26 · 22 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
602:50 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 22
- Minutes per game
- 27:24
- Points per game
- 8.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.3 / 1.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 8.8 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 3.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.8 | 6.3 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 2.9 | 5.1 |
| Season totals | 193 | 95 | 37 | 30 | 12 | 43 | 77 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 51–136 | 37.5% | 6.2 | 9.0 |
| 2P | 44–114 | 38.6% | 5.2 | 7.6 |
| 3P | 7–22 | 31.8%† | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| FT | 84–120 | 70.0% | 5.5 | 8.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40.1% | 51.1% | 16.2% | 88.2% | 0.86 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Tarleton St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $22K
- 80% range $2K to $79K
- Median share of team pool
- 9.8%
- team pool $270K, 80% range $100K to $735K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $20K to $23K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 52.6%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Tarleton St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Tarleton St | $22Kspeculative | $2K to $79K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.1 | -1.4 to +1.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | -0.2 | +2.9range +2.5 to +3.4 | 2,097 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Tarleton St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.6 | +0.7 to +2.5 | Limited evidence | +0.6 | +0.9 | +0.6range +0.6 to +0.7 | 596 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2024 | Arkansas St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.6 | -0.8 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | +1.1 | +2.3range +1.9 to +2.9 | 1,880 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Tarleton St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.2 | +0.1 to +2.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +1.2 | +2.2range +1.8 to +2.5 | 1,351 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 23:40 | 27:24 | 3:08–44:59 | |
| Points | 7.2 | 8.8 | 0.0–18.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 34.0% | 38.0% | 0.0%–75.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-11 | Abilene Christian | L 78–84 | 11:07 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-05 | UT Arlington | L 60–65 | 34:22 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | California Baptist | L 67–82 | 22:44 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 2-3 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | Utah Valley | L 72–79 | 23:30 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-9 | 1-1 | 3-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Utah Tech | L 72–80 | 26:38 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4-10 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 45.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | Southern Utah | W 78–74 | 15:51 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-7 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 28.6% |
| 2026-02-16 | Abilene Christian | W 65–62 | 26:56 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Abilene Christian | L 59–73 | 21:14 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Southern Utah | W 62–59 | 18:28 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-05 | California Baptist | L 55–56 | 21:36 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1-6 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-15 | Southern Utah | L 105–106 | 3:08 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | Abilene Christian | L 80–84 | 30:49 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | California Baptist | W 81–76 | 44:59 | 12 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2-8 | 0-2 | 8-12 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-01 | Utah Valley | L 85–91 | 39:49 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4-9 | 1-1 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | UT Arlington | W 69–63 | 33:26 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-6 | 0-2 | 2-6 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-19 | Florida A&M | W 78–54 | 28:45 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-01 | Cincinnati | L 58–76 | 33:06 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-6 | 2-3 | 4-6 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-14 | Baylor | L 81–94 | 33:29 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Merrimack | W 76–62 | 33:45 | 18 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 5-11 | 0-0 | 8-12 | 45.5% |
| 2025-11-08 | A&M-Corpus Christi | W 85–77 | 34:56 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 6-7 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-05 | LSU | L 60–96 | 37:21 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 3-10 | 1-4 | 5-8 | 35.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | SMU | L 76–96 | 26:51 | 15 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 13-15 | 25.0% |