Martin Somerville
Florida St. · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
855:02 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 25:55
- Points per game
- 8.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.0 / 2.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 8.0 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.4 | 4.6 | 3.6 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 4.0 |
| Season totals | 265 | 98 | 78 | 49 | 1 | 34 | 86 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 76–226 | 33.6% | 6.8 | 10.6 |
| 2P | 16–48 | 33.3%† | 1.5 | 2.2 |
| 3P | 60–178 | 33.7% | 5.4 | 8.3 |
| FT | 53–67 | 79.1% | 2.0 | 3.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.9% | 51.9% | 78.8% | 29.6% | 2.29 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Florida St · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $680K
- 80% range $395K to $1.45M
- Median share of team pool
- 18.3%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.90M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $680K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $29K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 64.4%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Florida St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Florida St | $680Kspeculative | $395K to $1.45M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.6 | +1.9 to +5.4 | Sufficient evidence | +1.9 | +1.7 | +5.0range +4.3 to +5.7 | 2,772 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | MA Lowell | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.7 | -0.4 to +1.9 | Sufficient evidence | +2.0 | -1.2 | +4.1range +3.5 to +4.9 | 2,836 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 25:57 | 25:55 | 20:32–33:35 | |
| Points | 4.8 | 8.0 | 0.0–23.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 36.4% | 44.9% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-12 | Duke | L 79–80 | 29:32 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-03-11 | California | W 95–89 | 26:17 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-03-07 | SMU | W 91–78 | 22:29 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-03-04 | Pittsburgh | W 75–74 | 26:13 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Georgia Tech | W 80–71 | 25:12 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-7 | 0-5 | 7-8 | 14.3% |
| 2026-02-24 | Miami (FL) | L 73–83 | 27:34 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1-7 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 21.4% |
| 2026-02-21 | Clemson | W 70–65 | 24:50 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-7 | 1-4 | 3-3 | 21.4% |
| 2026-02-17 | Boston College | W 80–72 | 27:26 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-6 | 1-5 | 2-4 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | Virginia Tech | W 92–69 | 29:51 | 23 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 9-11 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-10 | Virginia | L 58–61 | 23:38 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-7 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Notre Dame | W 82–79 | 31:04 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-8 | 2-7 | 1-2 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | Stanford | W 88–80 | 26:09 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | California | W 63–61 | 27:23 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1-6 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-24 | SMU | L 80–83 | 26:30 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-8 | 3-7 | 2-3 | 68.8% |
| 2026-01-20 | Miami (FL) | W 65–63 | 20:37 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-7 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-17 | Wake Forest | L 68–69 | 23:06 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-7 | 1-5 | 4-4 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-13 | Syracuse | L 86–94 | 20:32 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-9 | 4-7 | 6-7 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | NC State | L 69–113 | 25:08 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1-7 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 14.3% |
| 2026-01-03 | Duke | L 87–91 | 24:50 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-6 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-30 | North Carolina | L 66–79 | 33:35 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-9 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-22 | Jacksonville | W 87–63 | 29:29 | 23 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-10 | 5-10 | 8-8 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-19 | Mississippi Val. | W 96–49 | 24:52 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-5 | 1-5 | 3-3 | 30.0% |
| 2025-12-16 | Dayton | L 69–97 | 25:26 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 3-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Massachusetts | L 95–103 | 24:49 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-11 | 3-10 | 6-6 | 40.9% |
| 2025-12-06 | Houston | L 67–82 | 29:47 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-02 | Georgia | L 73–107 | 21:51 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-8 | 2-7 | 2-2 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-28 | Texas A&M | L 59–95 | 23:11 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-6 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | CSU Bakersfield | W 89–59 | 23:00 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-10 | 4-8 | 0-2 | 70.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Ga. Southern | W 98–72 | 21:45 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-18 | UT Martin | W 87–73 | 31:22 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Florida | L 76–78 | 30:37 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-7 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 21.4% |
| 2025-11-07 · NCAA | Alabama St. | W 101–64 | 26:12 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-9 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 77.8% |
| 2025-11-04 | Alcorn | W 108–76 | 20:45 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 90.0% |