Keyshawn Hall
Auburn · 2025–26 · 36 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1212:03 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 36
- Minutes per game
- 33:40
- Points per game
- 19.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 7.1 / 2.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 19.3 | 7.1 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 2.5 | 2.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 22.9 | 8.4 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 2.8 |
| Season totals | 694 | 254 | 94 | 26 | 23 | 90 | 85 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 201–446 | 45.1% | 12.4 | 14.7 |
| 2P | 137–277 | 49.5% | 7.7 | 9.1 |
| 3P | 64–169 | 37.9% | 4.7 | 5.6 |
| FT | 228–266 | 85.7% | 7.4 | 8.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.2% | 61.6% | 37.9% | 59.6% | 1.04 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Auburn · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $545K
- 80% range $300K to $855K
- Median share of team pool
- 15.3%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $545K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 79.9%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Auburn: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Auburn | $545Kspeculative | $300K to $855K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.4 | +1.1 to +3.6 | Sufficient evidence | +3.4 | -1.0 | +7.1range +6.2 to +7.8 | 4,002 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | UCF | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.4 | -0.6 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +1.1 | -0.7 | +4.1range +3.4 to +4.9 | 4,021 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | George Mason | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.4 | -1.7 to +0.8 | Sufficient evidence | +1.1 | -1.6 | +2.7range +2.1 to +3.6 | 2,563 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | UNLV | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.8 | -3.6 to -2.0 | Limited evidence | -1.0 | -1.8 | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.5 | 436 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:32 | 33:40 | 14:00–39:58 | |
| Points | 15.8 | 19.3 | 8.0–32.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 55.7% | 52.7% | 22.2%–92.9% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-05 | Tulsa | W 92–86 | 27:41 | 11 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 4-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-04-02 | Illinois St. | W 88–66 | 38:15 | 24 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 10-16 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 68.8% |
| 2026-03-25 | Nevada | W 75–69 | 28:00 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6-9 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 77.8% |
| 2026-03-22 | Seattle U | W 91–85 | 38:54 | 9 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4-14 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 32.1% |
| 2026-03-17 | South Alabama | W 78–67 | 39:50 | 21 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6-15 | 3-10 | 6-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-12 | Tennessee | L 62–72 | 34:20 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4-14 | 1-6 | 1-2 | 32.1% |
| 2026-03-11 | Mississippi St. | W 79–61 | 34:01 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-9 | 1-4 | 5-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Alabama | L 84–96 | 31:08 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4-8 | 2-5 | 3-3 | 62.5% |
| 2026-03-03 | LSU | W 88–74 | 36:15 | 17 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6-12 | 0-3 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Ole Miss | L 79–85 | 32:39 | 21 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-12 | 2-6 | 9-10 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | Oklahoma | L 79–91 | 32:28 | 26 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 7-10 | 1-1 | 11-11 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Kentucky | W 75–74 | 37:12 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-15 | 1-6 | 3-3 | 23.3% |
| 2026-02-18 | Mississippi St. | L 85–91 | 39:58 | 29 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8-17 | 4-7 | 9-11 | 58.8% |
| 2026-02-10 | Vanderbilt | L 76–84 | 25:34 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-13 | 3-5 | 4-5 | 34.6% |
| 2026-02-07 | Alabama | L 92–96 | 34:12 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 8-22 | 1-6 | 7-9 | 38.6% |
| 2026-01-31 | Tennessee | L 69–77 | 35:02 | 21 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7-17 | 3-9 | 4-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | Texas | W 88–82 | 36:47 | 31 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-13 | 3-6 | 14-17 | 65.4% |
| 2026-01-24 | Florida | W 76–67 | 38:37 | 24 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8-17 | 3-5 | 5-6 | 55.9% |
| 2026-01-20 | Ole Miss | W 78–66 | 34:24 | 19 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4-10 | 0-2 | 11-12 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | South Carolina | W 71–67 | 14:00 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2-7 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 28.6% |
| 2026-01-14 | Missouri | L 74–84 | 37:27 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2-9 | 0-3 | 6-8 | 22.2% |
| 2026-01-10 | Arkansas | W 95–73 | 38:19 | 32 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 11-14 | 4-5 | 6-6 | 92.9% |
| 2026-01-06 | Texas A&M | L 88–90 | 37:13 | 32 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8-15 | 3-5 | 13-16 | 63.3% |
| 2026-01-03 | Georgia | L 100–104 | 38:49 | 20 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5-13 | 1-4 | 9-12 | 42.3% |
| 2025-12-29 | Queens (NC) | W 106–65 | 24:46 | 18 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6-10 | 3-6 | 3-5 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Purdue | L 60–88 | 35:51 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5-11 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 54.5% |
| 2025-12-13 | Chattanooga | W 92–78 | 35:53 | 22 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5-9 | 1-5 | 11-14 | 61.1% |
| 2025-12-06 | Arizona | L 68–97 | 36:14 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3-11 | 1-4 | 6-6 | 31.8% |
| 2025-12-03 | NC State | W 83–73 | 35:53 | 28 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 9-14 | 5-7 | 5-5 | 82.1% |
| 2025-11-26 | St. John's (NY) | W 85–74 | 35:23 | 20 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5-11 | 1-3 | 9-12 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | Michigan | L 72–102 | 31:36 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-11 | 1-4 | 6-7 | 40.9% |
| 2025-11-24 | Oregon | W 84–73 | 35:43 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-14 | 2-7 | 6-6 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-16 | Houston | L 72–73 | 28:48 | 20 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-16 | 0-3 | 8-8 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-11 · NCAA | Wofford | W 93–62 | 27:06 | 20 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 7-10 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 85.0% |
| 2025-11-06 | Merrimack | W 95–57 | 26:35 | 25 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-9 | 1-1 | 12-13 | 72.2% |
| 2025-11-03 | Bethune-Cookman | W 95–90 | 37:10 | 28 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 5-12 | 2-4 | 16-18 | 50.0% |