Blake Muschalek
Auburn · 2025–26 · 27 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
146:16 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 27
- Minutes per game
- 5:25
- Points per game
- 0.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 0.6 / 0.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 4.4 | 4.4 | 1.4 | 3.3 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 7.1 |
| Season totals | 16 | 16 | 5 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 26 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 4–21 | 19.0%† | 0.8 | 5.7 |
| 2P | 2–7 | 28.6%† | 0.3 | 1.9 |
| 3P | 2–14 | 14.3%† | 0.5 | 3.8 |
| FT | 6–10 | 60.0%† | 0.4 | 2.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.8%† | 31.5%† | 66.7%† | 47.6%† | 1.25 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Auburn · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $43K
- 80% range $18K to $80K
- Median share of team pool
- 1.2%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $43K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $23K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 9.4%
- Limited evidence
- Limited evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Auburn: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Auburn | $43Kspeculative | $18K to $80K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.9 | -1.8 to +0.2 | Limited evidence | -0.7 | -0.1 | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.7 | 471 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 7:45 | 5:25 | 0:12–12:08 | |
| Points | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.0–5.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 6.7% | 25.6% | 0.0%–150.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-05 | Tulsa | W 92–86 | 10:00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-04-02 | Illinois St. | W 88–66 | 8:38 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-25 | Nevada | W 75–69 | 5:59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-03-12 | Tennessee | L 62–72 | 5:46 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-11 | Mississippi St. | W 79–61 | 8:23 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Alabama | L 84–96 | 4:52 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | LSU | W 88–74 | 6:10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-28 | Ole Miss | L 79–85 | 6:31 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Kentucky | W 75–74 | 2:19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-18 | Mississippi St. | L 85–91 | 1:32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-14 | Arkansas | L 75–88 | 2:47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Alabama | L 92–96 | 5:37 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Tennessee | L 69–77 | 5:00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-28 | Texas | W 88–82 | 3:35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-24 | Florida | W 76–67 | 2:10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-20 | Ole Miss | W 78–66 | 5:46 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-17 | South Carolina | W 71–67 | 6:30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-14 | Missouri | L 74–84 | 9:37 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Arkansas | W 95–73 | 10:11 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 150.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | Queens (NC) | W 106–65 | 3:20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | — |
| 2025-12-13 | Chattanooga | W 92–78 | 0:12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-03 | NC State | W 83–73 | 2:51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | Michigan | L 72–102 | 1:21 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-19 | Jackson St. | W 112–66 | 12:08 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-16 | Houston | L 72–73 | 0:57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-11-11 · NCAA | Wofford | W 93–62 | 6:24 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-06 | Merrimack | W 95–57 | 7:40 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |