Kendrick De Luna
Cal St. Fullerton · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
563:58 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 17:37
- Points per game
- 4.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.5 / 0.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 4.6 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 2.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 10.4 | 5.7 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 5.2 |
| Season totals | 147 | 80 | 30 | 16 | 24 | 28 | 73 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 50–104 | 48.1% | 3.3 | 7.4 |
| 2P | 49–103 | 47.6% | 3.2 | 7.3 |
| 3P | 1–1 | 100.0%† | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| FT | 46–66 | 69.7% | 2.1 | 4.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.6% | 55.2% | 1.0% | 63.5% | 1.07 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
CS Fullerton · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $13K
- 80% range $2K to $46K
- Median share of team pool
- 6.9%
- team pool $245K, 80% range $90K to $650K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $12K to $13K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 43.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
CS Fullerton: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | CS Fullerton | $13Kspeculative | $2K to $46K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.4 | -1.9 to +1.3 | Sufficient evidence | -2.0 | +1.6 | +2.9range +2.4 to +3.4 | 1,831 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | CS Fullerton | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -4.1 | -5.1 to -2.8 | Sufficient evidence | -3.3 | -0.8 | +0.6range +0.4 to +0.9 | 2,048 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | CS Fullerton | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -3.2 | -3.9 to -2.3 | Sufficient evidence | -3.1 | -0.1 | +0.5range +0.3 to +0.8 | 945 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 17:18 | 17:37 | 10:45–27:36 | |
| Points | 3.2 | 4.6 | 0.0–13.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 40.0% | 54.6% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | Hawaii | L 63–78 | 15:33 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-12 | UC Davis | W 82–70 | 14:54 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | CSUN | W 90–77 | 25:15 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-5 | 66.7% |
| 2026-03-05 | UC San Diego | W 75–71 | 16:27 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Hawaii | L 85–87 | 14:22 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | CSU Bakersfield | W 88–80 | 27:31 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 55.6% |
| 2026-02-19 | UC Davis | W 93–92 | 12:47 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | UC Irvine | L 65–86 | 10:45 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | Long Beach St. | W 86–82 | 20:39 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | CSU Bakersfield | W 82–66 | 13:43 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-05 | UC Riverside | W 78–72 | 16:20 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 7-8 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-31 · NCAA | UC Santa Barbara | L 69–83 | 20:54 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Cal Poly | W 93–78 | 24:23 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 80.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | Long Beach St. | W 71–61 | 17:51 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | UC Riverside | L 72–81 | 19:06 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | UC Davis | L 69–74 | 16:35 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | CSUN | W 86–79 | 14:22 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | UC San Diego | W 88–71 | 23:28 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-03 | UC Irvine | L 64–86 | 11:28 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-01 · NCAA | UC Santa Barbara | W 95–84 | 27:36 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-28 | SMU | L 63–110 | 14:50 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | Oklahoma St. | L 89–94 | 14:52 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Denver | W 105–86 | 19:57 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-07 | Hawaii | L 59–69 | 18:38 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-04 | Cal Poly | L 91–94 | 16:26 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-29 | Pepperdine | W 83–69 | 19:06 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | Northern Colo. | L 93–97 | 11:18 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-22 | St. Thomas (MN) | W 88–80 | 18:32 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Portland | L 85–103 | 13:08 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Pacific | L 73–85 | 21:32 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-10 | California | L 65–93 | 13:00 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 80.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Wyoming | L 82–92 | 18:40 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 14.3% |