Bryce Cofield
Cal St. Fullerton · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
680:57 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 21:17
- Points per game
- 9.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.8 / 2.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.8 | 4.8 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 2.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.4 | 8.9 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Season totals | 314 | 152 | 69 | 23 | 14 | 71 | 72 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 112–253 | 44.3% | 7.9 | 14.9 |
| 2P | 106–215 | 49.3% | 6.7 | 12.6 |
| 3P | 6–38 | 15.8%† | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| FT | 84–145 | 57.9% | 4.5 | 8.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.5% | 49.6% | 15.0% | 57.3% | 0.97 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
CS Fullerton · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $17K
- 80% range $2K to $57K
- Median share of team pool
- 8.8%
- team pool $245K, 80% range $90K to $650K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $16K to $17K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 52.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
CS Fullerton: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | CS Fullerton | $17Kspeculative | $2K to $57K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.1 | -1.4 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | +0.2 | +3.6range +2.9 to +4.1 | 2,211 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 19:04 | 21:17 | 8:57–31:31 | |
| Points | 6.0 | 9.8 | 0.0–27.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 35.5% | 44.4% | 0.0%–87.5% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | Hawaii | L 63–78 | 18:59 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 2-3 | 87.5% |
| 2026-03-12 | UC Davis | W 82–70 | 24:07 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 30.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | CSUN | W 90–77 | 16:20 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 4-8 | 20.0% |
| 2026-03-05 | UC San Diego | W 75–71 | 25:36 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Hawaii | L 85–87 | 10:16 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | CSU Bakersfield | W 88–80 | 17:15 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | UC Davis | W 93–92 | 14:21 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | UC Irvine | L 65–86 | 23:02 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5-13 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 38.5% |
| 2026-02-12 | Long Beach St. | W 86–82 | 24:21 | 18 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7-11 | 0-1 | 4-7 | 63.6% |
| 2026-02-07 | CSU Bakersfield | W 82–66 | 12:46 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-05 | UC Riverside | W 78–72 | 19:40 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-31 · NCAA | UC Santa Barbara | L 69–83 | 24:06 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Cal Poly | W 93–78 | 27:41 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | Long Beach St. | W 71–61 | 23:04 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | UC Riverside | L 72–81 | 23:23 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2-8 | 0-1 | 3-6 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | UC Davis | L 69–74 | 21:20 | 13 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-10 | CSUN | W 86–79 | 28:57 | 12 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 4-8 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | UC San Diego | W 88–71 | 25:32 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-03 | UC Irvine | L 64–86 | 22:24 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 11.1% |
| 2026-01-01 · NCAA | UC Santa Barbara | W 95–84 | 26:06 | 17 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 3-7 | 70.0% |
| 2025-12-28 | SMU | L 63–110 | 27:06 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2-10 | 0-2 | 3-6 | 20.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | Oklahoma St. | L 89–94 | 23:29 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 42.9% |
| 2025-12-13 | Denver | W 105–86 | 24:36 | 19 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 6-13 | 0-1 | 7-10 | 46.2% |
| 2025-12-07 | Hawaii | L 59–69 | 29:37 | 16 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 4-8 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-04 | Cal Poly | L 91–94 | 8:57 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-29 | Pepperdine | W 83–69 | 12:08 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | Northern Colo. | L 93–97 | 31:31 | 27 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-21 | 0-4 | 9-11 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-22 | St. Thomas (MN) | W 88–80 | 19:30 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-9 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 72.2% |
| 2025-11-21 | Portland | L 85–103 | 23:19 | 11 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-10 | 0-3 | 1-5 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Pacific | L 73–85 | 23:46 | 18 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6-15 | 1-2 | 5-8 | 43.3% |
| 2025-11-10 | California | L 65–93 | 13:03 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-4 | — |
| 2025-11-08 | Wyoming | L 82–92 | 14:39 | 21 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7-12 | 0-1 | 7-10 | 58.3% |