Cam Amboree
Southern U. · 2025–26 · 25 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
668:44 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 25
- Minutes per game
- 26:45
- Points per game
- 9.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.4 / 3.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.6 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 2.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.3 | 3.5 | 4.9 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 3.2 | 3.8 |
| Season totals | 239 | 59 | 82 | 27 | 1 | 54 | 63 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 73–212 | 34.4% | 8.5 | 12.7 |
| 2P | 32–106 | 30.2% | 4.2 | 6.3 |
| 3P | 41–106 | 38.7% | 4.2 | 6.3 |
| FT | 52–63 | 82.5% | 2.5 | 3.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.1% | 49.8% | 50.0% | 29.7% | 1.52 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Southern Univ · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $13K
- 80% range $2K to $46K
- Median share of team pool
- 9.5%
- team pool $175K, 80% range $60K to $480K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $13K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 52.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Southern Univ: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Southern Univ | $13Kspeculative | $2K to $46K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.2 | -1.2 to +0.8 | Sufficient evidence | -0.4 | +0.2 | +3.2range +2.8 to +3.6 | 2,295 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Southern Univ | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.2 | -2.6 to +0.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | -1.5 | +1.5range +1.1 to +1.9 | 1,088 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 29:50 | 26:45 | 7:00–45:15 | |
| Points | 10.8 | 9.6 | 0.0–21.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 64.2% | 44.4% | 0.0%–125.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-14 | Prairie View | L 66–72 | 26:02 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4-12 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2026-03-13 | Florida A&M | W 73–70 | 29:04 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 64.3% |
| 2026-03-12 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 84–81 | 28:39 | 14 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-9 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-03-05 | Alabama A&M | W 88–85 | 28:01 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 5-6 | 125.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Alabama St. | W 71–64 | 37:26 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-15 | 1-7 | 4-4 | 23.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | Bethune-Cookman | L 79–82 | 35:45 | 21 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-15 | 5-8 | 2-2 | 63.3% |
| 2026-02-26 | Florida A&M | L 71–82 | 27:20 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-13 | 1-5 | 7-10 | 26.9% |
| 2026-02-21 | Grambling | W 87–73 | 22:30 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-8 | 2-7 | 3-4 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-16 | Texas Southern | L 73–74 | 22:39 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-7 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 42.9% |
| 2026-02-14 | Prairie View | W 87–82 | 26:28 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3-8 | 0-3 | 10-10 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-09 | Alabama St. | W 69–68 | 19:24 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-8 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Alabama A&M | W 81–68 | 17:10 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Alcorn | L 73–78 | 7:00 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-05 | Prairie View | L 85–89 | 25:08 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 1-6 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Texas Southern | W 84–73 | 30:17 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2-7 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 42.9% |
| 2025-12-29 | Illinois | L 55–90 | 20:30 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | Baylor | L 67–111 | 31:49 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2-8 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-16 | California Baptist | L 67–75 | 33:49 | 18 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6-16 | 5-10 | 1-2 | 53.1% |
| 2025-12-10 | Texas St. | L 83–86 | 33:52 | 16 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 5-8 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 87.5% |
| 2025-12-08 | Texas | L 69–95 | 27:22 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-29 | Northwestern St. | W 75–73 | 25:55 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4-11 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 45.5% |
| 2025-11-21 | San Jose St. | L 66–80 | 33:33 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-12 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | Washington | L 93–99 | 45:15 | 18 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 5-11 | 1-5 | 7-8 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-05 | Marquette | L 82–100 | 23:47 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-03 | Arkansas | L 77–109 | 9:59 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 37.5% |