FL Atlantic

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for FL Atlantic, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
Player	Possession share	Net and range	Wins above replacement and range	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range
Isaiah Elohim	71.2%	-0.1range -1.3 to +0.9Sufficient evidence	+4.7range +4.0 to +5.3Sufficient evidence	$61KspeculativeLoading	$7K to $175KLoading
Kanaan Carlyle	67.0%	+2.1range +0.9 to +3.1Sufficient evidence	+5.4range +4.9 to +6.0Sufficient evidence	$155KspeculativeLoading	$62K to $385KLoading
Niccolo Moretti	65.3%	+0.6range -0.7 to +1.5Sufficient evidence	+4.6range +3.9 to +5.2Sufficient evidence	$80KspeculativeLoading	$16K to $210KLoading
Devin Williams	60.0%	+0.6range -0.4 to +1.7Sufficient evidence	+4.3range +3.8 to +4.8Sufficient evidence	$74KspeculativeLoading	$19K to $195KLoading
Devin Vanterpool	55.5%	+1.8range +0.4 to +3.2Sufficient evidence	+4.5range +3.9 to +5.0Sufficient evidence	$115KspeculativeLoading	$43K to $305KLoading
Josiah Parker	54.1%	+0.1range -1.0 to +1.0Sufficient evidence	+3.7range +3.2 to +4.2Sufficient evidence	$55KspeculativeLoading	$9K to $155KLoading
Xander Pintelon	45.3%	+1.8range +0.4 to +3.1Sufficient evidence	+3.6range +3.1 to +4.1Sufficient evidence	$91KspeculativeLoading	$32K to $240KLoading
Maxim Logue	23.8%	+2.0range +1.3 to +2.8Sufficient evidence	+2.0range +1.8 to +2.1Sufficient evidence	$58KspeculativeLoading	$24K to $150KLoading
Amar Amkou	21.9%	+0.1range -0.6 to +0.9Sufficient evidence	+1.5range +1.4 to +1.7Sufficient evidence	$27KspeculativeLoading	$8K to $69KLoading
Yohann Sissoko	19.9%	+0.0range -0.8 to +1.1Sufficient evidence	+1.4range +1.2 to +1.5Sufficient evidence	$24KspeculativeLoading	$7K to $63KLoading
Max Langenfeld	8.1%	-1.6range -2.5 to -0.7Limited evidence	+0.5range +0.4 to +0.5Limited evidence	$9KspeculativeLoading	$3K to $24KLoading
Vincent Neugebauer	7.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$6Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$2K to $14KLoading
Liam Dayco-Green	0.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$6Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$2K to $14KLoading
Lachlan Smith	0.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$6Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$2K to $14KLoading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Team Pool: $825K; 80% Range $370K to $1.85M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $740K to $860K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Isaiah Elohim	71.2%	$61K	$7K to $175K	9.5%	$55K to $64K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kanaan Carlyle	67.0%	$155K	$62K to $385K	17.0%	$135K to $160K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Niccolo Moretti	65.3%	$80K	$16K to $210K	11.3%	$72K to $84K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Devin Williams	60.0%	$74K	$19K to $195K	10.4%	$66K to $76K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Devin Vanterpool	55.5%	$115K	$43K to $305K	13.2%	$100K to $120K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Josiah Parker	54.1%	$55K	$9K to $155K	8.2%	$49K to $57K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Xander Pintelon	45.3%	$91K	$32K to $240K	10.5%	$81K to $94K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Maxim Logue	23.8%	$58K	$24K to $150K	6.4%	$52K to $61K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Amar Amkou	21.9%	$27K	$8K to $69K	3.8%	$24K to $28K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Yohann Sissoko	19.9%	$24K	$7K to $63K	3.5%	$22K to $25K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Max Langenfeld	8.1%	$9K	$3K to $24K	1.1%	$8K to $10K	$6K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Vincent Neugebauer	7.1%	$6K	$2K to $14K	0.7%	$5K to $6K	$6K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Liam Dayco-Green	0.9%	$6K	$2K to $14K	0.7%	$5K to $6K	$6K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Lachlan Smith	0.1%	$6K	$2K to $14K	0.7%	$5K to $6K	$6K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$825K	$370K to $1.85M	100%	$740K to $860K	—

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Florida Atlantic University (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$4,829,626	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$4,829,626
Athletics department expenses	$49,292,817
Athletics department revenue	$49,292,817

Coverage and exclusions

29 of 31 games passed lineup acceptance (94%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

2 of 31 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue	$4,829,626	Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses	$4,829,626	Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest days	Games
First game (no rest value)	1
1 day	3
3 or more days	27

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days	1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent	2
Longest run of consecutive away games	2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology